Soldato
I think that's what he meant - gibbo previously commented that if you had SLI and 120fps that there was no benefit, I think Arcane just meant that it even happens in these circumstances as well
Exactly.
All is good
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I think that's what he meant - gibbo previously commented that if you had SLI and 120fps that there was no benefit, I think Arcane just meant that it even happens in these circumstances as well
Exactly.
anandtech has posted a video to showcase the differences:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAzRHVXaaV0
i can't say ive experienced the stuttering shown here with v-sync on, not sure if this is because i use triple buffering (forced with dx3doverride)?
Well it definitely looks smoother then the other 2 in that video. Its a hell of a lot smoother then the mess of tearing and jerkiness that is 60hz with vsync off. You can still see a little bit of stuttering with vsync on which isn't there on the gsync monitor at all. Overall, the difference between vsync on and gsync looks pretty minor but if you factor in input lag then it could be a much better solution over all.
Now we need to see comparisons at 120hz or 144hz.
You are never going to get a perspective of how smooth it is by watching a youtube video. It needs to be seen from a couple of feet away and in proper gaming environments.
My point is though, the systems I game on are smoother than the G-Sync one in that video.
My system spec - HD 7990 either attached to a 30" DELL or a 27" 144Hz 1ms iiyama and it is far smoother than the G-Sync in that video.
That's the problem though, almost everyone isn't going to be able to see it first hand without taking a hit when DSR'ing. All they are going to have are people's opinions. It certainly appears to be a tech you need to see in the flesh or use, because from those videos I wouldn't want to pay the premium and be locked down vastly by my monitor choice.
My red corner rig is coming on-line tonight/tomorrow, so will then have both green & red to use, but right now I am more interested in Mantle than G-Sync.
My point is though, the systems I game on are smoother than the G-Sync one in that video.
My system spec - HD 7990 either attached to a 30" DELL or a 27" 144Hz 1ms iiyama and it is far smoother than the G-Sync in that video.
It am quite surprised at Gibbo being so negative, when it will be profit for any that are sold in truth.
Carmack et al were promised something in return for kind words, quid pro quo.
They went a bit overboard though and showed their hand.
For all the guys at the conference to claim this as a "Game changer", I am quite surprised at the negativity of this. Sure for monetary increases, the likes of Asus/BenQ will be cashing in (well said earlier Bru) but this surely has to be given a chance before being written off?
It am quite surprised at Gibbo being so negative, when it will be profit for any that are sold in truth.
Not negative, I am just not so sold on it yet. Let me see one, I might change my mind.
Just to me its not making much sense and seems over-priced. If the BenQ models are fairly priced and the G-Sync is beneficial then they will be great, it is just a shame BenQ models won't show for about another two months or so.