I think it is the other way around...You tried to assert that they should not stay here and should have been removed along with Qatada, which is contrary to how British law works, the fact is that his Children are not Jordanian Citizens, they are British Citizens by merit of their Birth and the Law...As far as your point on China, Qatada would have been naturalized under the rules that they apply to asylum (Asylum seekers had no legal status until recently so granting legal residence as he had in Britain would have meant becoming a Chinese Citizen (hundreds of Refugees arriving from Pakistan have been naturalised in China under similar circumstances, which was the point being made) as he could not hold two nationalities and as such his children would have been born Chinese Citizens.
The point is also being made that they have not been given citizenship for simply being born here...but because they and their family were settled here (after being offered and granted Asylum) and under British Law that makes them British Citizens, not for just being born here, which doesn't. Which is the point your are arguing is it not?