Abu Qatada
- Thread starter the wopster
- Start date
Well that went well didn't it? Qatada has appealed to the European Supreme Court and it looks like the Home Office have bungled it again, not knowing the deadline for such an appeal.
I ask again how is France able to deport suspected terrorists within hours of their arrest?
I ask again how is France able to deport suspected terrorists within hours of their arrest?
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2009
- Posts
- 2,124
He preaches hate and is here illegally, why is this taking so long? 
hang on, give me a gun with a single round, ill save the country thousands of £
hang on, give me a gun with a single round, ill save the country thousands of £
Indeed I thought it was rather "brave" of May to try it, seemed obvious that Qatada would appeal again.
Probably by sticking them on the nearest plane as soon as they are arrested and then once they are in Jordan or wherever it is too late for them to actually do anything about it. We have a tendancy to play by the rules which is both a good and a bad thing.
Quite frankly we ought to ignore the 'European Court of Human Rights' - its an utter joke that we allow ourselves to be bound by their decision on this or indeed anything.
Our own supreme court had already agreed to it, follow EU human rights legislation and are generally much better qualified as Judges on average than the mix of eurotrash from god knows where that make up the European Court.
They moved the goal posts in the last case - they wanted assurances that he wouldn't be tortured, these were received, then they ruled against deportation as they then wanted assurances be tried using evidence gained from torture... which hadn't previously been required by them. (though these assurances have been given by Jordan)
The idea, in itself, that Judges from places such as Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Albania, Georgia and Turkey can overrule a human rights ruling from a British court is a joke in itself. Its not like decisions haven't been ignored before, we should tell them to GTFO, ignore the ruling and go with our own Supreme Court's decision that deporting him is compatible with EU law.
Last edited:
here:
(just added to highlight that most religions are ridicules when taken to extremes)
Love those vids, but the people in this one have better moves:
And totally agree!
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 7,321
- Location
- Western Seaboard
dont care what religion people are from extremism in all forms especially when it supports violence in furthering its cause should not be tolerated how everr it looks like he has a repreive for the time thx european court of human rights why are we just about the only european country that follows its recomendations ? jeez
[/QUOTE]
I don’t know how one could ever bring oneself to hang keys on that. :D
It seems to me absolutely crazy that we let Europe tell us where and when we can deport individuals like this. Could you even imagine anyone trying to impose these kinds of restrictions on the US?
Government seem to now have made a potentially very costly mistake, or at the least given his lawyers, and the Labour party the opportunity to waste even more public money over the whole affair.
Government seem to now have made a potentially very costly mistake, or at the least given his lawyers, and the Labour party the opportunity to waste even more public money over the whole affair.
A couple of hundred grand for him and a 5 bedroom Georgian town house in Notting Hill?
that is so awesome I'm actually quite tempted to rip the idea off an make one for myself....
No, we should obey the laws we've signed up to. If we don't like the convention we should leave it or seek to change it's scope, but not disregard it when we don't like certain decisions.
It's a bad sign when a government ignores laws due to public outrage or when they become an inconvenience, let's just leave the convention, it's a great ideal badly implemented and use our own court system which is up to the job anyway. Whilst we're at it any funding of the European Court shouldn't be covered by us once we have left.