Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Mar 2005
- Posts
- 2,984
- Location
- Birmingham, UK
I do aspire to be a don, but its most unlikely to happendata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
Gilly said:Nothing to do with me any more, I just don't think calling the people that have the power to stop you being a member here any more dictators is such a brilliant idea...
Fair point, but it really depends on your definition of a dictator. Hmm beaten by CBS for my last point.Gilly said:I just don't think calling the people that have the power to stop you being a member here any more dictators is such a brilliant idea...
cleanbluesky said:Because banning people who call you a dictator is in fact the mark of a solid democratic system?
cleanbluesky said:Because banning people who call you a dictator is in fact the mark of a solid democratic system?
Who ever said the system here was democratic?cleanbluesky said:Because banning people who call you a dictator is in fact the mark of a solid democratic system?
cleanbluesky said:Because banning people who call you a dictator is in fact the mark of a solid democratic system?
dymetrie said:No, it'd be a personal attack (well, personal to a group) which iirc is against the rules...
*smug*
Seraphim said:No, it takes a whole lot of time to even be an Underboss, let alone a Don. Having said that, all the Dons really do is respond to the things the UBs point out, right?![]()
dymetrie said:No, it'd be a personal attack (well, personal to a group) which iirc is against the rules...
*smug*
Seraphim said:In a shock attempt to bring this potential train-wreck of a thread back on track, Seraphim posts a semi-serious reply to the original post.
Nix said:Did you vote yes?![]()