Adult content - Age Verification system - April 2018

Caporegime
Joined
22 Nov 2005
Posts
45,276
Really weird why they've banned female ejaculation... ok it is basically just a girl peeing rather than 'ejaculating' but still - is it also the case that men peeing is banned?
one french study of seven people concluded it is pee(2 normal pee the other 5 had some sperm enhancing liquid in the pee) but I'm not convinced.

it's clear like water, has almost no odour and leaves no pee stains behind just a very slight white mark like the lubricant women secrete naturally.

in these videos it probably 90% of the time is just pee though
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
32,618
Some of the anime fans on here will no doubt be gutted....

Really weird why they've banned female ejaculation... ok it is basically just a girl peeing rather than 'ejaculating' but still - is it also the case that men peeing is banned?

I really don't understand the logic behind most this stuff?

I can sort of see the reasoning behind why they might want really violent stuff (say rape related etc..) and the "role-play as non adults" as it creates a fantasy around quite serious sexual crimes. Then again I'm not sure there is necessarily a link - people can happily watch violent movies without going on a killing spree so why not let them watch some rape or schoolgirl stuff if that is what they're into so long as the "rape" is just acted and so long as the schoolgirl is actually an adult then it shouldn't be a big deal.



The female ejaculation is the only part i disagree with. Especially since men will be allowed to ejaculate all over the women, yet some how women can't ejaculate?

TBH, would be nice if they banned the nasty face-shot stuff, nobody wants to see that filth and its entire purpsoe is to degrade woemn.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
What about really violent movies at the cinema, ones that depict rape say, are they going to be banned as well?
The female ejaculation is the only part i disagree with. Especially since men will be allowed to ejaculate all over the women, yet some how women can't ejaculate?

TBH, would be nice if they banned the nasty face-shot stuff, nobody wants to see that filth and its entire purpsoe is to degrade woemn.
Are we happy to make things that are purely distasteful actually illegal? If so there's a whole bunch of films I personally find distasteful. Who do I talk to about getting them banned? :p

This is the problem. We're making the govt the final arbiter about what things are not only legal, but what is moral and tasteful. And everything that isn't moral or tasteful in their eyes will now be illegal.
 
Caporegime
Joined
28 Jan 2003
Posts
39,876
Location
England
And we are putting this trust in the filthiest perverts in all the land.

I mean it's hilarious that a senior member of the cabinet was found with porn on his work computer.
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Posts
9,315
TBH, would be nice if they banned the nasty face-shot stuff, nobody wants to see that filth and its entire purpsoe is to degrade woemn.

TBF, this is what the Tories are doing - deciding for other what they can and can't see based on their own preferences (in this case to be seen to be "doing something" "think of the children", etc). In a grown up society, people make their own decisions and deal with the consequences, and that includes having children and policing what they do on the internet, instead of expecting others to do it for them. You may not want to watch one type of porn, but if others want to make/watch it, then that's up to them and no one is forcing you. If we go down the road of banning things because one group of people don't like to look at it, then there won't be anything, anywhere for anyone.

It's not like MPs are well known for being the country's moral centre and are pretty much the last people to be in charge of anything like this.
 
Caporegime
Joined
28 Jan 2003
Posts
39,876
Location
England
The thing is this is not just about porn, it's about extremist content too, they are just pushing the porn angle the most as they know most people are too embarrassed to stand up against it because they will be labelled a perv.

And also this which I saw on another forum.

This whole thing has nothing to do with porn at all. It’s about getting a system implemented that can filter and detect what is being accessed by who and when.

Once this is implemented under the guise of “we are protecting your children” it is trivial to modify the filtering mechanisms for “terrorism” and whatever other content they want flagged (and whoever else they want flagged).
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Posts
9,315
The thing is this is not just about porn, it's about extremist content too, they are just pushing the porn angle the most as they know most people are too embarrassed to stand up against it because they will be labelled a perv.

Yes, the porn thing is a smokescreen. It's actually about controlling the internet. These systems get put into place under the guise of porn control, and it will be easy to extend to anything. Look at how easily the child-porn blocklist was extended to aid big business in blocking IP theft and counterfeiting. The ISPs don't fight any court orders and we're one step away from ISPs just blocking what ever the media cartels tell them to block based on over-reaching (and often wrong) automatic systems.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2011
Posts
10,821
Location
Darlington
They've been trying to get rid of the Pirate Bay for years now but there are loads of proxy links people use to access it. I imagine the same thing will happen to banned access to certain porn sites, people will just proxy their around to them.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Dec 2014
Posts
5,781
Location
Midlands
Telegraph.co.uk - Government Postpones age check for Porn websites

Made me lol :p

Our Government is so embarrassingly incompetent - When it comes to the internet, they're oblivious.

Cretins, total utter time wasters all of them, I wonder how much cash they've thrown at "consultants" and other useless people, to come to the conclusion that this is probably not going to be an effective policy...

They've been trying to get rid of the Pirate Bay for years now but there are loads of proxy links people use to access it. I imagine the same thing will happen to banned access to certain porn sites, people will just proxy their around to them.

There was one point about 3-4 years ago, where most of the ISPs were working hell for leather to enforce the automatic blocking of torrent sites which had received court judgements, I actually helped design one of the blocking systems for a big ISP, trouble was at the time we all knew people would just proxy around them - but we were just doing the bare minimum to satisfy the government legislation (we'd be fined if we didn't because we were one of the 4 biggest ISPs), we didn't really feel the need to be thrashing money into a bigger system to restrict the service our customers were paying for anyway, (we didn't really care that much)

We had 1Tbps+ inbound most days to around 6 million subscribers, and the vast majority of that traffic was google (youtube) and facebook, a tiny tiny proportion of it was torrenting, torrenting really didn't bother us, constantly having enough peering capacity to handle stuff like Youtube was 10x worse to deal with.

In the last few years, a number of different torrent sites have appeared and focus has shifted away a little, as a result - I can now get directly to the pirate bay without having to proxy, (it used to be blocked) along with a number of other sites, I rarely even use proxies now, whereas a few years ago I had to.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 May 2009
Posts
22,101
What are your thoughts on the new age verification system coming in April 2018 which will require age ID to visit adult content? I think it's also linked to your credit card! That's the crucial part.

Meh, this has been standard for quite some time on mobile broadband and with many fixed ISPs, it's more industry standardization than something new.
 

V F

V F

Soldato
Joined
13 Aug 2003
Posts
21,184
Location
UK
on their poll so far 900 people voted almost and 90% voted NO its a prviacy risk and won't stop teenies finding porn

Teens finding porn? The last I heard years ago the problem was they were making their own with their smartphones.
 
Back
Top Bottom