She added that although this is the first news of criminal charges, civil suits have been filed.
"In the meantime… there were some civil cases that were brought," Ms Feraday said.
One of these was with the husband of Halyna Hutchins.
"He now has a role working on the movie with Alec Baldwin, and the details of that settlement beyond that are sealed
![]()
Rust shooting - latest: Alec Baldwin's team comes out fighting as victim's family say he showed 'conscious disregard for life'
Alec Baldwin will be charged with involuntary manslaughter, the New Mexico District Attorney reveals, over the 2021 Rust set shooting.news.sky.com
Upto 18 months in jail don't reckon that will happen.
That is uhh Hollywood for you I guess.am i reading this right, the lady that was killed, her husband brought a civil case against AB, which resulted in him ending up with a role in the film with AB??
Bit harsh.
The armourer - absolutely but the actor ?
Bit harsh.
The armourer - absolutely but the actor ?
There is certain element of personal responsibility there though. You should check yourself regardless of what you're told.
If you're going to use a firearm and point it at people then basic firearms safety ought to be key, that ought to include making sure it is safe,
When acting a scene that's not always possible. That's in part why they have an armourer there to do that job. And to take that responsibility.
It'll be interesting to see whether a jury will convict him.
I'd be amazed if she's found not guilty though - as the armourer it would have been her responsibility first to ensure there was no live ammunition on set.
The blanks I have used were very obviously different to live rounds. On the left is a live and blank on the right. Some (Automatics) have a cardboard "bullet" that is shredded as its come out of the barrel.
![]()
I suspect they will have found a long list of bad practices and screw ups on that set.I think Baldwin will avoid a sentence. He was unlucky and at the end of a chain of incompetence. But as someone got killed they won't just exclude someone who was directly involved from the trial.
If its not possible then you shouldn't use a real firearm on set.
It's being reported it's either up-to 18 months + $5k fine or, five years if the charge is upgraded to include "firearm enhancement" i believe.Ohh, up to 12 years for that.
Not just that but he was also the producer. He should take responsibility for not following H&S. I am pretty sure when it is reviewed that many things were missed that led to the tragedy.
If my staff were not trained correctly and one of them died under my custody I would expect the law to be coming down on me too.
I'm guessing that it happens a lot in the industry, and usually nothing bad happens but this time they got caught out.Makes more sense from the footage on the day - poorly organised, large amounts of incompetence, poor H&S (which is likely backed up with procedures not being followed/logged) and so on in evidence in the footage - which is something higher level management involved should be on top of.
I'm only a supervisor at work, covering the duty manager role as non-management, but if I was running operations below me with that kind of stuff going on I'd be out on my ear in no time (and likely prosecuted if something like that happened - albeit we don't do anything with firearms at work LOL though we do sometimes handle explosives).