Amanda Knox and her Ex found guilty of the Murder of Medredith Kercher

I didn't doubt she wouldn't be found guility to be honest. The evidence was against her case from the very beginning, and she didn't help herself by making it even more obvious with her perculier behaviour and changes to her side of the story.

She is a strange bird for sure...but evidence against her from the beginning? WHAT evidence? They have circumstantial DNA evidence which is so inconclusive American forensics teams would have thrown it out.
 
Last edited:
That guys is gonna get raped in jail...

I hope he's not averse to a loo brush up the Khyber Pass. :eek:

The case against them was overwhelming, despite all the bluff and bluster from their defence team. It didn't help that they couldn't keep their stories straight, tried to blame each other and lied about their alibis.
 
Kind of ironic the septics moaning about the Italian law system, do they forget OJ Simpson...

Hardly ironic. People are still allowed their opinion, plus considering how long ago the OJ Simpson trial was. They're not directly relatable.
 
How does that work exactly?

They're not going to have that much money... where does this money come from?

The whole case seems a complete farce to me.

I don't know if they're guilty or not, but neither does the Italian justice system.

The BBC article I read didn't provide any conclusive evidence that she was guilty, it makes no difference to me if she is or isn't of course, but it just doesn't seem completely right.
 
They only have circumstantial evidence. I don't really think she is innocent but at the same time neither do I believe in a trial with no direct evidence.
 
I just cant understand what the motive was here. Why stab somebody because they won't take part in a sex game? It's not going to make them change their mind, what IS it going to acheive :confused:
 
[TW]Fox;15463939 said:
I just cant understand what the motive was here. Why stab somebody because they won't take part in a sex game? It's not going to make them change their mind, what IS it going to acheive :confused:

Justice?
 
wheres the evidence? :confused:

can anyone put together the evidence which honestly says Knox and Sollecito and Guede killed her??????


one thing is a dead cert these days.... wonder who'll be playing the lead roles in the hollywood remake?
 
They only have circumstantial evidence. I don't really think she is innocent but at the same time neither do I believe in a trial with no direct evidence.

'direct evidence' as you call it is not necessary, circumstantial evidence is very powerful - and the verdict reached in this case was correct. the two could not prove their innocence, and their guilt was very very likely...
 
I am not sure of the integrity of the Italian justice system but I must admit there has always been something very micey about Ms Knox. Not since Maxine Carr has someone made my skin crawl for reasons unknown.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom