• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Bulldozer Finally!

My facts have been proven wrong? Show me.



Actually, I said "especially in single and dual threaded programs", I did not say "only in single and dual threaded programs". The SB still beats it even when all six cores of the Phenom are being used. It beats it at stock, and it beats it even more when overclocked.



Riiiiiight.



A Thuban made sense before Sandybridge came. Right now?.... it doesn't, unless *maybe* if you're going with a 1055T with a run of the mill Motherboard.

Your facts are wrong because my point was nothing about Sandybridge which your now drumming about in response.

I have AMD motherboard & the cheapest optional is to drop a AMD hexcore & it gets the job done & in a configuration that suites me, none of your options are cheaper no matter what range of AMD hex core i was on about.

You can carry on with your arrogant stance of what makes sense to you based on your narrow views of what people needs & circumstances are all you like because even when they are pointed out to you, you still ignore them.
 
Last edited:
No, that is not a possibility.

so hold on a second there, so why are Cebit did ASROCK basically claim that their 890FX board WILL support Bulldozer, even though its an AM3 board...? :confused:

am I missing something here?

Edit: this article claims MSI and ASROCK have AMD 8 series motherboards (AM3) which are Bulldozer ready...? (actually can't post, has competitors in the site!)
 
Last edited:
so hold on a second there, so why are Cebit did ASROCK basically claim that their 890FX board WILL support Bulldozer, even though its an AM3 board...? :confused:

am I missing something here?

Edit: this article claims MSI and ASROCK have AMD 8 series motherboards (AM3) which are Bulldozer ready...? (actually can't post, has competitors in the site!)

As far as I am aware, the 8 series chipsets DO support bulldozer with no loss of features.
HOWEVER, AM3+ uses a different number of pins than AM3 so you won't be able to drop a new chip into the current motherboards.

Why they chose a different amount of pins if the 8 series chipset works otherwise is beyond me.
 
that makes even less sense, what the devil is going on? reading an article here claiming that a 'partner' of AMD has managed to get one of the sample Bulldozer chips working in socket AM3 with a special BIOS. so, that suggests that they are compatible pin for pin with AM3 surely, or else how would it fit? :confused:
 
Will my mobo support the new Bull chips?

I for one genuinely don't have a clue, as I said Im confused to hell with the contradictory things flying around all over the net, some claim it will work with AM3 and some claim it absolutely will not work with AM3, since I have read absolutely nothing about Bulldozer really, no 'previews' or anything, no idea about the pin layout I think its gonna be impossible to tell until they are released. seems weird that JF is saying the absolutely will not work with AM3, but as said before a motherboard manufacturer 'claimed' to be able to get Bulldozer working with a special BIOS...:confused:
 
I'm convinced now that they won't work with am3, the socket has an extra hole:

am3.png


Look at the lower left notch of plastic on the socket itself, am3 on the right it is blocking 2 holes, am3+ on the left it is only blocking 1.
 
wow! you must have eyes like a hawk to spot that, so were talking one pin difference? :D hold on a second, what about the pin layout on the actual chip, does it have a pin for that hole? is there any shots of Bulldozer pin-out?
 
Question is why? I understand the extra pin is for power regulation...

Am I right thinking the AM3 Phenom II/Athlon II has a DDR2 and DDR3 controller onboard, yet BD will have no DDR2 controller? Why such a similar pin layout?
 
Question is why? I understand the extra pin is for power regulation...

Am I right thinking the AM3 Phenom II/Athlon II has a DDR2 and DDR3 controller onboard, yet BD will have no DDR2 controller? Why such a similar pin layout?

thats why I was asking the cynical question of whether Bulldozer even has a pin for that hole or whether its all just to say its not compatible with AM3...? :D
 
The people asking if it will be supported on your current boards, I am 97% sure the answer is NO, given that JF_AMD himself has said it and think about it, if he goes around spouting incorrect information it's his job on the line. So I think he can be trusted.

Those of you talking about Bulldozer working on 8 series chipsets - yes it will, but you need a completely different board. The chipset supports Bulldozer, but needs to be built on a board to support it from the ground up.

At the end of the day, you might as well just get a 9 series chipset as you'll need to switch board anyway. Personally i'll be sticking where I am to see what happens with Bulldozer performance, it's an FX-6000/8000 and an ITX board or an i7-2600S and the DH67CF.
 
Back
Top Bottom