• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**AMD Fiji Thread**

Boomstick777 said:
You think GPUZ needs an update?

I though the last version had Fiji update already.

If that Pixel / Texture fill-rate is correct it is indeed a monster.

Come to me my pretty !
Click to expand...

I don't know maybe Amd have made a mistake on purpose in there slides. Maybe throw the competition of there trail. There are mistakes on the benchmark part so it's a possibility.
 
Last edited:
From the article:

Lastly, here is the first ever GPU-Z screenshot of Radeon R9 Fury X. Note the bandwidth is wrong (should be 512 GB/s) and ROP count is incorrect (should be 64) — I’m sure W1zzard will fix it with the next release.
Click to expand...
 
AMDMatt said:
We'll be supporting the Fury X in Linux. :)
Click to expand...

:cool:

Any ETA on Freesync support Matt ?

smogsy said:
just to confirm you are supporting it in linux
[like everyone other card amd does]
but will it beat a 750ti in benchmarks?
[ eg have some performance to actually use!...]

290 loses to a 750ti on Linux in several games.

until this is addressed i have no choice but Nvidia :(
i like options god dam you!
Click to expand...


Might want to check the driver thread as the improvements with regards the 15.5s smogs
I'm hoping that they have carried on with the improvments. I beat a 970 in the Valley BM now so it's a good show on the driver front

Posted in the Phronix/GOL forums too.

https://www.gamingonlinux.com/forum/topic/1374

http://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/linux-graphics-x-org-drivers/amd-linux/805391-catalyst-15-5-for-linux-brings-some-performance-improvements
 
billyturbo said:
From the article:

Lastly, here is the first ever GPU-Z screenshot of Radeon R9 Fury X. Note the bandwidth is wrong (should be 512 GB/s) and ROP count is incorrect (should be 64) — I’m sure W1zzard will fix it with the next release.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Good spot, would that mean the 'Pixel / Texture Fill rate' are wrong also?

24th seems so far away right now lol.
 
Praying the fury turns out to be a monster, i think its gonna be time to retire my 7970's

Has there been any speculation of a waterblock for the supposed air cooled version of this card? Would be a shame to not be able to add it to my loop.
 
Weird move from AMD !!

AMD withdraw KitGuru Fury X sample over ‘negative content’

"On the 11th June AMD informed us via email that the upcoming FIJI hardware was reserved for KitGuru, as would normally be the case. We subsequently set a plan in motion to analyse the hardware for launch and were awaiting the arrival of the sample. Earlier this week I had a call from Christine Brown, Senior Manager, EMEA Communications at AMD to let me know that the company had withdrawn their sample from KitGuru labs and that we would now not be involved at all in the launch next week.
Christine Browne informed me directly on the phone that the reason for withdrawing the sample was based on ‘KitGuru’s negative stance towards AMD’. She said that with limited product they wanted to focus on giving the samples to publications that are ‘more positive’ about AMD as a brand, and company. I was not informed during this call of anything we have published that was factually incorrect, we were also not told to edit or remove any content we had published. Based on what AMD had seen via KitGuru editorial in recent weeks it was felt that overall coverage was just too negative."

http://www.kitguru.net/site-news/an...-kitguru-fury-x-sample-over-negative-content/

http://www.eteknix.com/things-go-from-bad-to-worse-for-reviews-of-amd-radeon-fury-x/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom