• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**AMD Fiji Thread**

WTF!!!

How is it that AMD are expected to beat Nvidia's top end card? AMD are literally a few weeks after 980Ti and you expect them to beat it convincingly?

All they need to do is trade blows for Fury to be a success. A viable AMD alternative is finally here(ish) and that is great for the consumer and for prices. If AMD Fury X was not close to release we would never see such great deals as a £499.99 AIB custom cooled 980Ti.

Well done AMD, even though I went for the great Zotac 980Ti AMP deal, I am delighted to see the Fury X is a viable alternative at the high end.


My £499 980Ti has nothing to do with Fury to be frank.

Just like how I did Titan X at £799 several weeks ago.

The sole reason for hitting £499 on a 980Ti was to be the first to go sub £500 on a 980Ti like it was first to go sub £800 on a Titan X.

The outcome is huge sales, huge marketing exposure because you are remembered for being 1st, never 2nd. :)

The fact Fury is here in a few days is just coincidence, I was hitting £499 on a 980Ti irrelevant of what AMD do. :)
 
WTF!!!

How is it that AMD are expected to beat Nvidia's top end card? AMD are literally a few weeks after 980Ti and you expect them to beat it convincingly?

All they need to do is trade blows for Fury to be a success. A viable AMD alternative is finally here(ish) and that is great for the consumer and for prices. If AMD Fury X was not close to release we would never see such great deals as a £499.99 AIB custom cooled 980Ti.

Well done AMD, even though I went for the great Zotac 980Ti AMP deal, I am delighted to see the Fury X is a viable alternative at the high end.

How old is the Nvidia equivalent as opposed to AMD's offerings?
 
running a loss leader to generate media coverage and click throughs ;)gets the brand further `out there` and means some would order items. increases sales base and with to notch customer service , keeps them coming back.
 
Sorry, the other day you said you had a UK exclusive on 500 G1's coming in

Yes most of which are all pre-sold. So far 240 shipped, 260 more due over next couple of weeks and right now about 150 pre-sold.

It really needs no promotion this card to sell it. I was supposed to publish my review over a week ago, but have simply held it off because I'd rather wait until I have large inventory to sell.

It is scary to have 100's of a card on pre-order and customers waiting, so I have held of posting the G1 review as long as possible and so far have only published a Heaven 4.0 score of it beating all the watercooled Titan X cards on this forum. :)
 
To early to tell, I want to wait for the reviews to come where they test a lot more games at varying resolutions.

My home machine is 1080P and the games I play hardly tax such cards.

Thanks for that, I'm in the same boat, my 780 is still strong at 1080p but the upgrade itch and the GSYNC/freesync thing is gripping me.

I'll wait out for more benchmarks and tests.
 
How old is the Nvidia equivalent as opposed to AMD's offerings?

980Ti released 1st June
Fury X releases 24th June

So less than a month. Titan X was released in mid March and was marginalised by 980Ti a few months later. AMD are hardly late to the party with high end. I didn't count 980 as that much better than 290X AIB custom cooled cards to be honest, especially at 1440p or 4K. Though AMD should have had revised 290X cards released months ago rather than waiting for the joke (IMHO) rebrand 390X cards.
 
Last edited:
WTF!!!

How is it that AMD are expected to beat Nvidia's top end card? AMD are literally a few weeks after 980Ti and you expect them to beat it convincingly?

All they need to do is trade blows for Fury to be a success. A viable AMD alternative is finally here(ish) and that is great for the consumer and for prices. If AMD Fury X was not close to release we would never see such great deals as a £499.99 AIB custom cooled 980Ti.

Well done AMD, even though I went for the great Zotac 980Ti AMP deal, I am delighted to see the Fury X is a viable alternative at the high end.

Exactly. Are Nvidia fanboys comparing a brand new architecture with a mature Maxwell architecture? Sounds very similar to how the 970 was compared to a 2 year old 290X. Didn't see many complaining that the 970 was barely faster than the 290X then.

If Fiji is matching the top end Nvidia cards right at the start of its life at a much lower clock speed then it is the better architecture and it will no doubt get faster as they refine the process.
 
Last edited:
Exactly. Are Nvidia fanboys comparing a brand new architecture with a mature Maxwell architecture? Sounds very similar to how the 970 was compared to a 2 year old 290X. Didn't see many complaining that the 970 was barely faster than the 290X then.

If Fiji is matching the top end Nvidia cards right at the start of its life then it is the better architecture since it will no doubt get faster as they refine the process.

Sorry, what?. Both sides next cards will be on 16ff+ and will be a new arch so how exactly can they refine Fiji before that?
 
Guys. I've a 780T case, with a Corsair H105 in the roof, the radiator of that occupies 2 120mm fan positions leaving room for a 120mm fan as shown below

15262259097_844325bc70_c.jpg


Would it be a good or bad idea to put the FuryX radiator and fan to the right of the H105 in the roof so all my rads would be at the top? see below, it's really cool up in that corner just above the DVD Drive.

16119085137_a55b159603_c.jpg
 
Sorry, what?. Both sides next cards will be on 16ff+ and will be a new arch so how exactly can they refine Fiji before that?

Refining as in getting better yields. If they can't do that then did Nvidia intentionally release the 980 at lower speeds to milk the buyers before releasing the 980ti? They are on the same process after all..

edit: Maybe AMD have released the FuryX at an intentional lower speed to match the top end Nvidia cards for now and then release a superclocked Fury later on to deliver a killer blow...Interesting.
 
Last edited:
My £499 980Ti has nothing to do with Fury to be frank.

Just like how I did Titan X at £799 several weeks ago.

The sole reason for hitting £499 on a 980Ti was to be the first to go sub £500 on a 980Ti like it was first to go sub £800 on a Titan X.

The outcome is huge sales, huge marketing exposure because you are remembered for being 1st, never 2nd. :)

The fact Fury is here in a few days is just coincidence, I was hitting £499 on a 980Ti irrelevant of what AMD do. :)

Whatever the motives, I'm happy to be wrong as it's a great price. Thanks Gibbo and OCUK :)
 
Refining as in getting better yields. If they can't do that then did Nvidia intentionally release the 980 at lower speeds to milk the buyers before releasing the 980ti? They are on the same process after all..

edit: Maybe AMD have released the FuryX at an intentional lower speed to match the top end Nvidia cards for now and then release a superclocked Fury later on to deliver a killer blow...Interesting.

Nah their dual Furyx is ths killer blow in a couple of months.

If one furyx can match/slightly beat a 980ti then imagine what two will do with around 80% scaling!

Of course AMD seriously need to fix all their xfire drivers.......................
 
Refining as in getting better yields. If they can't do that then did Nvidia intentionally release the 980 at lower speeds to milk the buyers before releasing the 980ti? They are on the same process after all..

edit: Maybe AMD have released the FuryX at an intentional lower speed to match the top end Nvidia cards for now and then release a superclocked Fury later on to deliver a killer blow...Interesting.

Reviews will reveal if stock Fury X is faster, or trades blows with stock 980Ti. Remember Custom cooled 980Ti cards are faster than stock. I would assume (maybe wrongly) that AIBs can customise their Fury X cards with custom PCBs, higher stock clocks and even better AOI coolers.

Interesting times ahead for both Nvidia and AMD.
 
Back
Top Bottom