**AMD Fiji Thread**

[skarpinis]

43 fps only what a joke

 

[Meladath]

Who the hell runs max AA at 1440p, let alone 4K. That's just a pointless FPS sink. Max at 4K should be considered 2xAA. The pixel density is so high jaggies are hard enough to see at 0AA.

 

[Gerard]

8xaa as well ^

 

[RavenXXX2]

Hmm... AMD still suck at Tessellation then?

 

[humbug]

Oh look at that, the same score as a stock 290X, riiiiiiight.....

 

[Frenzy]

Is this score board the same?

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=25214824&postcount=1745

They appear to use 8xmsaa on that, the results don't look right for such a card. I don't believe it.

 

[J.D]

That's for 1920x1080 if you go to the opening post so no, it's not comparable.

 

[Gerard]

Whens this thread gonna be fixed =/

 

[Frenzy]

The one I linked is for extra high resolutions, it has 1200p and 1440p listed.

 

[Mynight]

There's 1440p on that link .

 

[skarpinis]

Meladath I can see difference not all people same

 

[humbug]

The screen shot with the score could be any R9 series card, its all it says.

 

[melmac]

http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/94716834-post75.html

 

[J.D]

My bad, I went to the very first post. The heaven score posted above does seem to be a load of rubbish then.

 

[Frenzy]

no worries

 

[Frenzy]

Link to the shadow of mordor bench list
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18627134

Again that result seems off...

 

[humbug]

Pha... never noticed this before....

1080P single card results

1. 168.82 - Pulse88 - 290X
2. 131.86 - Africanos23 - TitanX
3. 111.67 - Uncle Petey - 290
4. 100.92 - Kaapstad - 980
5. 95.00 - Robzere31 - 290
6. 82.70 - Wazza300 - 7970

 

[Loxa]

How many different brands will be available on launch?

 

[Captain]

Seems like there is only one benchmark so far then?

 

[PakJai]

And the cpu was running at stock speed. Most gamers are already pulling 4Ghz+ these days.