AMD Fiji Thread

Lokken86 · 24 Jun 2015 at 07:57

For that kind of performance I'd pay up to £450. £650, no thanks.

shamus21 · 24 Jun 2015 at 07:57

Yes the Titan X is well over priced for what it offers but it is about the Brand you are paying the Extra for the BIG X

cutchy2k · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:10

I am super excited to see what the benchmarks say about the fury x, for some reason no one else i know thinks this is a big deal :'(

Firefox35 · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:14

I doubt it will beat the 980ti, might get close in some games, its a very unique design, shame it does not support HDMI 2.0, if it had I may of been tempted to run one in my second system.

Mtom · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:22

Even IF these benches are legit they are cherry picked settings to drop the Fury X on the back foot.

Guru3D Cod:AW bench vs this one:

toodoo9011 · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:24

my card goes back into my wallet

cutchy2k · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:27

Whats a Radeon HD 7970 Ghz ?

Mynight · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:28

It's what I've got. It was an OCd 7970 to shockingly 1 ghz

.

cutchy2k · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:33

Ahh nice, good work

toodoo9011 · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:45

unless you get 2 of them..is crossfire really bad compared to sli...

Devrij · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:51

Not long to wait now. Hoping these leaked benches are a load of poop, because they would put a 980ti in a good place. Either way, I'm ordering a card today.

Mynight · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:54

Do they have a pic of the card in their test bench?

RavenXXX2 · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:54

£650 lol good luck with that. TI is the way to go unless with volts turn the X into an absolute monster, which I doubt.

theor14 · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:57

Hmm may be getting a 980ti AMP extreme or G1 if this is true

Harlequin · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:58

if you go by what Gibo has said - the raw numbers aren't the only `thing` about this card - he said theres more to it than raw numbers- it runs very cool and quiet for the performance

toodoo9011 · 24 Jun 2015 at 08:58

wish i had bought the those palits!!

Locky · 24 Jun 2015 at 09:00

If those numbers are legit then it's complete fail IMO.

Awahwah · 24 Jun 2015 at 09:00

What toodoo9011 said.

Silent_Scone · 24 Jun 2015 at 09:01

It means, if that's with the texture pack correctly installed that the game isn't suffering any performance degradation from having less than the specified 6GB VRAM for that preset

if, it's installed correctly

EDIT: oh I seem to have been quoting a post from Humbug that the moderators removed last night -.-

fornowagain · 24 Jun 2015 at 09:12

Here ya go http://imgur.com/KOYLvgP
Too bad not as fast as titan x when using firestrike to benchmark.
But could be because I am using evga titan x sc

Trying to overclock it now -
4790k 4.0ghz 32 gb G.Skill Trident X 1x Sapphire Fury X
stock speed firestrike score - 13459

But might I add the card with the radiator never got over 47 degrees celsius~ too bad I can't get 100mhz extra out of the card - trying to over 70mhz more....

Fury is a little overloaded - http://imgur.com/o727F1M
Best I got on stable overclocking is 1092mhz, 42mhz extra. I tried power limit settings but didnt make any difference... http://imgur.com/snODgiJ
Firestrike score - http://imgur.com/91luSev
Going higher than 42mhz just kills firestrike at different places.
Current temprature after all the clock setting updates and test is 57 degrees celsius
Hope other users have a better card than me when overclocking
I will keep it at stock and see if AMD will improve their drivers for this card..hopefully will make it faster and more stable in oc...

and

http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/h...iew]-sapphire-amd-r9-fury-x-rise-5087633.html

Competitor rules

**AMD Fiji Thread**

AMD Fiji Thread