Associate
Off looks like the best option there as trails from slow pixel response don't intrude nearly as much as overshoot for me and on high the overdrive is causing a whole load of overshoot!
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
look out for my all new hardware reviews where i pout a lot and gregster tries to pronounce ubisoft!!!
all these review sites suck!
they about to learn what time it is!!!
Vortez.net: FreeSync Technology Review
huge plaudits to AMD and their partners for FreeSync, and to VESA for implementing Adaptive Sync as a optional standard in DisplayPort 1.2a. With continued support many more people should be enjoying tear-and-stutter-free gaming in the very near future. In the mean time we have more to look at with FreeSync, and will be adding to this article accordingly. Even so, despite this being a strictly first impressions, FreeSync has to get our Elite award for being an absolute game changer.
First quick impressions are very good.. It really does smooth out the frame itch /stutter you get when frame rate drops..
Perfect test is to blow something up in Battlefield and close range and then move about really fast.. It remains smooth
More testing needed could only use it test range for couple mins..
.
It's rubbish and doesn't work under 40 fps.
yes the benq is range is 40hz - 144hz
so below 40hz the freesync doesn't work
at below 40 fps the vsync can't sync to the hz so it is just as crap as it always was.
This obviously won't be a problem for Xfire users except that as far as i am aware Xfire doesn't work on freesync.
Allright, thought freesync worked at lower hz.
Allright, thought freesync worked at lower hz.
As always there are a few small caveats. The most obvious, and it's so obvious it barely needs mentioning, is that you need an AMD card to use this. In some ways we fear it will go the same way as PhysX because of this, where the technology that wins is the one that works on everything. The second thing of note is that, at the time of writing, there is no CrossFire support. R9 295X2 owners or those of you with multiple physical cards need not apply. At the time of writing there is no support for Eyefinity either which is a massive shame considering that this was one of the things AMD had absolutely nailed. Given that the biggest gains from Freesync are to be had when you're above the usual 60FPS limit then it behooves you to have as much graphical prowess as possible and so we're sure that AMD will fix this limitation sooner rather than later. Lastly in titles with particularly low frame rates, 20-odd FPS in Metro for example, having Freesync on brings with it a stuttering that isn't present with Freesync off.
Depends on the monitor.
Even if we see monitors that work down to 9hz or whatever I don't think you want to be gaming at anything lower than 30.
Well it does it works at 40hz, Realistically PC gamers buying a XL2730Z will be looking to utilize the 144hz side of things.
Other panels may go lower and focus on a smaller range. (and IPS freesync for example may focus on (30-75 hz)
honestly with it enabled and vsync turned on the game basically works as well as it ever could aslong as the fps is above 40 on the Benq.
TTL writes this
Crossfire support is coming in the April driver (so expect that around July).
I honestly believe gamers who are dipping that low would either change settings to accommodate or get more GPU grunt, whether that be multiple GPU or just a better GFX card. I was quite worried at first but don't anticipate to dip as low as that