- Joined
- 23 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 863
- Location
- Mirfield, West Yorkshire,
Forgot to mention, I have ordered some Red Cold Cathodes hoping they will arrive today (Due to arrive 21st but only got the dispatched email last night)
You're missing the bigger picture ghost; ignoring the fact it's an AMD based system, op paid over the odds for that spec. For 900 he could have had a 7970/670 and 3570k/amd alernative. Sunk too much money on a mobo for a dead platform, went for one of the least cost effective gpus on the market and overspecced areas that don't impact on performance.
Had he come along and suggested an i3/£200mobo/full tower case/1000w psu/550ti etc, as a gaming pc, he would have recieved a similar reception.
People could have responded in a more gentle manner but this type of reaction to stubborness is typical on the internet.
The point of giving advise is to stop someone from making a mistake. What the OP done is basically "I'm determine to burn my food during cooking...any suggestion to make the burnt food taste better?" People: "Em...wouldn't you be better off just to NOT burn your food in the first place? I can show you how to do it..it is not that hard at all." OP: "I don't care if my burnt food is not as good as properly cooked food as long as it is still edible...so you want to help me or not?" People: "......"Not once have I suggested you suggest an inferior cpu. The point I will make again is that he made his choice, albeit a poor one if compared to what could be purchased at the price points in the current market if go on performance alone and not choice. But the op stressed in several of his initial posts that he wanted amd, purchased amd and had chosen amd. To that point alone it is irrelative the performance of competing components and brands. We as a performance community should now help him get the best from his chosen system. saying it rubbish is pointless. he will be able to game with a decent/modest overclock of both the cpu/gpu/ram get a decent performance with help from this forum. The rest is irrelative to the op.
The point of giving advise is to stop someone from making a mistake. What the OP done is basically "I'm determine to burn my food during cooking...any suggestion to make the burnt food taste better?" People: "Em...wouldn't you be better off just to NOT burn your food in the first place? I can show you how to do it..it is not that hard at all." OP: "I don't care if my burnt food is not as good as properly cooked food as long as it is still edible...so you want to help me or not?" People: "......"
Burnt as in like a piece of toast burn to the point of black rather than brown...The police could tell him to do a couple of flips for the spectators especially if he was bungie jumping for charity.
On a side note some food does taste a little better on the burnt side, Roast potatoes for one example, you could then say, well yes, i can make your burnt food better if you like it burnt, cook it in goose fat as it tastes better and will give the potatoes more of a glow....
Ah thanks, I shall Benchmark with DiRT Showdown tonight for you as soon as I get in from work. I don't play the game much as I have bought my self a few other games recently.
Sorry for the inactivity, I have been on holiday in the last week.
As for cooling temps I also have the processor up to 4.5Ghz (couldn't justify the temperatures at 5Ghz) and on load (Prime 95) I only get 2'C higher then standard clock.
Here is a list of all the games I have and play on 1080p with maximum graphic settings (Ultra if supported) (Custom with everything up full) with 60+ frames per second;
Skyrim
DiRT Showdown
GTA IV + EFLC (Bought complete GTA Pack from Steam with every GTA PC game for £19.99 (includes EFLC, IV, SA, VC, III, II, I) even though GTA IV was £19.99 also?)
Off-Road Driving (Only game of its kind, google it!)
Batman Arkham Asylum (Girlfriend plays it and the PhysX Feature is awesome!)
Batman Arkham City (Again girlfriend mainly plays)
Microsoft Flight Simulator X (Little brother wants to be in the RAF so he plays it occasionally)
Minecraft (I know its not demanding, I just like building... )
Serious Sam HD (Was gifted it by a friend, played for 10 mins, don't really like it)
Team Fortress 2 (Mainly girlfriend plays it as to be honest I am terrible...)
Thanks for the support Ghost12, finally a reply that i was looking for and it only took 9 pages....
You're missing the bigger picture ghost; ignoring the fact it's an AMD based system, op paid over the odds for that spec. For 900 he could have had a 7970/670 and 3570k/amd alernative. Sunk too much money on a mobo for a dead platform, went for one of the least cost effective gpus on the market and overspecced areas that don't impact on performance.
Had he come along and suggested an i3/£200mobo/full tower case/1000w psu/550ti etc, as a gaming pc, he would have recieved a similar reception.
People could have responded in a more gentle manner but this type of reaction to stubborness is typical on the internet.
Not a problem oliver, If you intend to use this forum as a regular I expect you will get used to it regards your personal choice of cpu. You should be fine with most of those games, some im not so sure about personally though with the fx, Microsoft flight apparently works better with intel so would be interested to hear your results. My wife plays wow on the fx4170, another game not suited to fx from what I believe but I can Factually tell you its great in that game even in raid with the gtx560 1gb gpu. After you start using your machine for your games I will absolutely personally guarantee you, you will wonder what all this fuss is about. The problems are not as apparent in the setup you chose as some would have you believe. On one 60hz screen if you get 80fps instead of 100fps and above sixty minimum in most games or even playable minimus round 40-50 you would never tell the difference. Don't be perturbed by non constructive comments. post your results. There are people interested
I may be in the minority about how to treat people and respect their decisions but im quite happy to be stood alone
interesting. I would ask you why you think other people cant 'respect' that somebody might make a poor decision that isnt based on logic or facts, without having to agree with it, but I believe this thread has already been pulled far enough off topic. Suffice to say your view of other people in this thread is somewhat skewed, and i can't help but think it has something to do with your owning a bulldozer. Perhaps another thread should be started to discussion these issues more fully? After all, the op isnt listen to anybody trying to make him see sense (just about anybody but yourself) so it seems futile to continue in this one.
Some very decent rig parts there oliver. I would be interested to know how you get on with temps with the h80. I bought an antec 620 and for the fx4170 it stays well within temps up to around 4.5 I find under prime 95 stress. The antec was no good whatsoever with the fx8120 though when overclocked as the 8120 is a different beast to the fx4170 in real use. For my fx8120 I now use a corsair h100 and under full load its more than enough even at my oc of 4.6. I have four x 120mm fans in push pull config though and a 220mm side panel fan on my case so have no heat issues whatsoever.