• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Launches FMF2-Amd Fluid Motion Frames 2

Cob said:
Been running this on Starfield for the past few days at 1440p with my 6700xt and it’s made quite a difference. It actually looks ok, tho the crosshairs definitely have artefacts if you stop and look at them. Definitely going to keep using it.
Click to expand...
FMF2's strength is-versatility, it covers the whole range from handhelds to top end, and you are clearly seeing the benefits of what AMD's driver level frame gen brings to the table.:thumbsup
 
TheRealDeal said:
You don't think Freesync, G-Sync compatable, Adaptive Sync monitors are better Sync tech than plain old V-Sync?
Click to expand...
Nope. Not when they introduce what I can only describe as glitches onscreen. Its not tearing but its not smooth either its a kind of vague rippling effect during motion it'd really need a video to show what I mean. Vsync is always smooth and yes its a freesync/gsync compatible monitor.
 
Blackjack Davy said:
Nope. Not when they introduce what I can only describe as glitches onscreen. Its not tearing but its not smooth either its a kind of vague rippling effect during motion it'd really need a video to show what I mean. Vsync is always smooth and yes its a freesync/gsync compatible monitor.
Click to expand...
Got to be something wrong there. No way i would go back to V-Sync after having Freesync Pro on this Samsung G7 240hz. In games where i get 240fps it's like poetry in motion.
 
Blackjack Davy said:
Nope. Not when they introduce what I can only describe as glitches onscreen. Its not tearing but its not smooth either its a kind of vague rippling effect during motion it'd really need a video to show what I mean. Vsync is always smooth and yes its a freesync/gsync compatible monitor.
Click to expand...
Sounds like something is wrong to me. What's the freesync range of your monitor? I've never experienced anything like you describe with VRR.
 
Quadrupole frame rates with frame gen and AMD Fluid Motion Frames. Benchmarking Black Myth Wukong first without the in game frame gen, then with and then with AMD's driver level frame gen, the result is going from 30 FPS, to 60 FPS and to 120 FPS with AFMF.AFMF doesn't register on the Riva Tuner OSD on the left because its a post render AI frame gen tech at the AMD driver level, the AMD OSD on the right displays the final frame rate render output.

Start: Frame Gen off
3:00 Frame Gen On
6:30 AFMF On.

 
Lads, try it on WH3:

tenor.gif


I tried it fairly late, and was expecting it not to work that well (as it's a beta /tech preview), but so far it's been fine.

EDIT - It needs some more optimisation I think, as it doesn't seem to always function well in Baldur's Gate 3 - Vulkan API (framerate dips).

EDIT2 - BG3 works better using the DX11 API after some testing. The framerate is more stable (less GPU usage spikes), especially when capped to 80 FPS. So, it also works better when using frame generation, than it does with Vulkan.

Playing BG3 with Framegen is not really need on my PC, especially since I have a 60hz monitor...
 
Last edited:
humbug said:
Quadrupole frame rates with frame gen and AMD Fluid Motion Frames. Benchmarking Black Myth Wukong first without the in game frame gen, then with and then with AMD's driver level frame gen, the result is going from 30 FPS, to 60 FPS and to 120 FPS with AFMF.AFMF doesn't register on the Riva Tuner OSD on the left because its a post render AI frame gen tech at the AMD driver level, the AMD OSD on the right displays the final frame rate render output.

Start: Frame Gen off
3:00 Frame Gen On
6:30 AFMF On.

Click to expand...
I don't know if it's the benchmark or maybe the encoding but that looks a bit juddery and the pop-in was annoying, but I think it did look a bit better at the higher framerates.
I think one of the key things with all this will be how it feels, can you notice any input lag, etc.
 
GoogalyMoogaly said:
I don't know if it's the benchmark or maybe the encoding but that looks a bit juddery and the pop-in was annoying, but I think it did look a bit better at the higher framerates.
I think one of the key things with all this will be how it feels, can you notice any input lag, etc.
Click to expand...

Yes i can see the micro judder, that's entirely Youtube.

I'll upload the original 120Hz file to google drive, its completely smooth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom