• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Navi 23 ‘NVIDIA Killer’ GPU Rumored to Support Hardware Ray Tracing, Coming Next Year

Status
Not open for further replies.
New details from reliable leaker

Navi 2 will launch 2 months after Nvidias Ampere - currently you can pencil in November - the only cards you'll get this year is reference design. AIB will not have enough to test samples and design after market coolers and launch them till early next year.

As of right now, AMD has only just sent a team of software engineers to start writing drivers and AMD has not finalised every part of the reference PCB.

The top Navi2 PCB currently has 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM using 384bit bus at 18Gbps

No performance rumours to release due to the cards not yet been final, most rumours are just guesses and completely baseless with no facts according to this leaker.

Read more: https://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-...raphics-card-16-gb-vram-q4-2020-launch-rumor/
 
Grim5 said:
New details from reliable leaker

Navi 2 will launch 2 months after Nvidias Ampere - currently you can pencil in November - the only cards you'll get this year is reference design. AIB will not have enough to test samples and design after market coolers and launch them till early next year(Leaker or WCCFtech never said that).

As of right now, AMD has only just sent a team of software engineers to start writing drivers(No just no. Quote in spoiler below) and AMD has not finalised every part of the reference PCB.

When it comes to the development progress of the Big Navi GPU, the first validation sample was sent recently to Shanghai for driver development.

The top Navi2 PCB currently has 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM using 384bit bus at 18Gbps (No confirmation of speed by the leaker)

No performance rumours to release due to the cards not yet been final, most rumours are just guesses and completely baseless with no facts according to this leaker.

Read more: https://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-...raphics-card-16-gb-vram-q4-2020-launch-rumor/
Click to expand...

FTFY :rolleyes:
 
The smell of fear is strong. 16gb may prove detrimental with these future console ports :p

If anything, paying for top tier card with low vram might not be wise if those rumors are true. Therefore, matching vram for shared ram on consoles might be ideal.
 
Last edited:
"I'm impatient and not prepared to wait, so I'm going to bend over and just give Nvidia the stupid money they ask for."

Do you people hear yourself? And you wonder why Nvidia can charge £1,300 for a card that didn't give that much raster performance increase and couldn't offer resolutions and frame rates better than a card one-fifth its price when you turned on its advertised big feature?
 
LePhuronn said:
"I'm impatient and not prepared to wait, so I'm going to bend over and just give Nvidia the stupid money they ask for."

Do you people hear yourself? And you wonder why Nvidia can charge £1,300 for a card that didn't give that much raster performance increase and couldn't offer resolutions and frame rates better than a card one-fifth its price when you turned on its advertised big feature?
Click to expand...
Psst, he was buying Nvidia no matter what anyway. And pay extra for the dongle and all. Gotta read in between the lines.
 
hmmm, this leak is saying 225% performance increase over the 5700XT. But AMD themselves are saying "up to 50% performance per watt increase"

I wonder which will turn out to be true.
 
melmac said:
hmmm, this leak is saying 225% performance increase over the 5700XT. But AMD themselves are saying "up to 50% performance per watt increase"

I wonder which will turn out to be true.
Click to expand...

It can be both.

Edit, I'm not saying the performance rumours are true, just that technically it can be both those things.
 
humbug said:
AMD have their own DLSS and it doesn't require developers to enable it. ;)
Click to expand...

Are you talking about DirectML or FidelityFX? In both cases developers need to enable it? DirectML isn't AMD's and FidelityFX isn't DLSS.

EastCoastHandle said:
Now don't you go talking bad about dlss. With its Artificial Intelligence being able to add pixels to assets that the developer forgot to detail. We simply need to ignore the fact that it has to be added per game.:p

If I simply just played the game without zooming in on images that are 30 miles down the road I wouldn't have known that Fidelity fx CAS just didn't do it. /s
:D
Click to expand...

This post is kind of ironic. If Humbug is talking about DirectML, then artificial intelligence is going to be doing exactly that. If he is talking about FidelityFX, then no it can't add missing details as FidelityFX is just an upscaler but it does need to be added by the developer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom