only by a little bit - from what I've seen with RTX turning RT on at 4k requires an extra 500-1000mb of vram
Depends a bit on the implementation - IIRC Quake 2 RTX grabs an additional 2.5GB allocation for screen buffers alone at 4K.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
only by a little bit - from what I've seen with RTX turning RT on at 4k requires an extra 500-1000mb of vram
That's a lotDepends a bit on the implementation - IIRC Quake 2 RTX grabs an additional 2.5GB allocation for screen buffers alone at 4K.
Well, RT increases VRAM usage, so even that scenario would cause VRAM to be a factor earlier on.
Navi 21 at only 2.1Ghz was looking shakey
Navi 22 at 2.4Ghz is looking promising
Allegedly
255w is tough to swallow.. humbug should be out with his calculators any time now
The firmware stuff (assuming it is real) had 250watt and 230watt options but 2.4GHz at 255watt on any larger core with RTX 3080/90 performance would need quite some engineering.
255w is tough to swallow.. humbug should be out with his calculators any time now
You get my point tho?
The firmware stuff (assuming it is real) had 250watt and 230watt options but 2.4GHz at 255watt on any larger core with RTX 3080/90 performance would need quite some engineering.
Its 70% more power than the Series X GPU.
What would that be in relation to Rx 5700 xt?
0% more power, 120% higher performance?
On the Chiphell's graph it's 132%
https://www.chiphell.com/thread-2264233-1-1.html
Let's hope these figures are not out of thin air.
How? the 3080 is 350w!!!255w is tough to swallow.. humbug should be out with his calculators any time now