• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD on the road to recovery.

The 10nm bomb has hamstrung them. If the process was on time they would have expanded production and built new fabs as usual and AMD's revival wouldn't be quite proverbial phoenix.
But at this point they're better off focusing on their 7nm process for 2023.

Us enthusiasts/desktop/gamer crew are a small group in relative terms. Fab space is precious, and the bean counters have probably concluded that it doesn't make sense for intel to sell the 8700k for 3600 prices when they have gargantuan OEM's breathing down their necks to fulfill orders.

Right. And with that Intel are not just fighting a resurgence AMD in their back yard, Intel's cash cows are developing their own custom CPU's to cull their reliance on AMD and primarily Intel.
 
The 10nm bomb has hamstrung them. If the process was on time they would have expanded production and built new fabs as usual and AMD's revival wouldn't be quite proverbial phoenix.
But at this point they're better off focusing on their 7nm process for 2023.

Us enthusiasts/desktop/gamer crew are a small group in relative terms. Fab space is precious, and the bean counters have probably concluded that it doesn't make sense for intel to sell the 8700k for 3600 prices when they have gargantuan OEM's breathing down their necks to fulfill orders.

2023 is looking like mid 2024. Intel said they would want a year to overlap, apparently the bake time on the proposed nodes is bonkers long. I’m not sure if Intel was including bake times with the over lap. I have a hunch Intels strategy is to put pressure on the GPU market between now and 2024. They can’t compete with AMD on the CPU and APU front, but they could possibly strong arm the industry into taking GPU’s from the old nodes at a decent profit with the promise of fulling more 14/22nm CPU orders.
 
Yeah, they have been for the past 3 years, TSMC have had the same problem this past year, they built a brand new fab to expand 7nm capacity, its coming online early next year. They have plans to expand even more. TSMC are confident enough about long term demand from their fabs to invest.

Intel have been doing a lot of talking, but not actually doing much. Not having enough capacity is a good situation to be in, sure. But their action's suggest they don't think it will last.

Despite news that intel has capacity issue, i still see more laptops with intel inside being sold by retailers. Just yesterday an electronics store inside a mall here in Barcelona, of the 20 or so laptops in display only 2 are AMD. One with a 3500U/Vega10 selliing for 650 euro.
 
Despite news that intel has capacity issue, i still see more laptops with intel inside being sold by retailers. Just yesterday an electronics store inside a mall here in Barcelona, of the 20 or so laptops in display only 2 are AMD. One with a 3500U/Vega10 selliing for 650 euro.

This is a problem AMD need to address, yes, they are tackling that next.
 
AMD closes the year with a new record high at Mindfactory
RqoPsmR.png
 
AMD closes the year with a new record high at Mindfactory
RqoPsmR.png

86%!? Even if the average in Europe was 75%, it's like the only choice is AMD these days. Over here, it seems we still put too much stock in the Intel brand when we shouldnt. Because imo you cant recommend Intel's 14nm CPUs over AMD's with Ryzen 3000 on the market, even for purely gaming as the tiny difference is outweighed by the negatives.
 
5,000 R5 3600, and 3,000 R7 3700X from one supplier, in one country, in one month. Total Intel sales ~4,600, total AMD sales ~27,500.

I wonder what the ASP is for the AMD products.
 
86%!? Even if the average in Europe was 75%, it's like the only choice is AMD these days. Over here, it seems we still put too much stock in the Intel brand when we shouldnt. Because imo you cant recommend Intel's 14nm CPUs over AMD's with Ryzen 3000 on the market, even for purely gaming as the tiny difference is outweighed by the negatives.
Correct, it's not really hard to work out. For most scenario's it's a no brainer to go Ryzen if buying now.
 
Last edited:
Intel are currently at $60 https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/INTC

With AMD now at $50 and climbing rapidly how long before AMD overtake Intel?

Yes i know its just a number and means nothing, AMD's value currently stands at $55bn with Intel at $265bn, but its till a great phycological target.

$60 would give AMD a value of about $70bn, i'd love to see AMD valued at $100bn by the end of the year.
 
AMD seem even more excited and optimistic about 2020 products. The share price is interesting. I won't be surprised of a big correction at some point followed by a consolidation but that would be pretty normal given the massive run it's had.
 
With their current strategy and complete disinterest of any steps to improve their competitive positions (read super expensive underperforming products), I think they are heading to going under, not to improve anytime soon.

Intel aren't going under anytime soon, remember there's die hard lunatics like you, but flying Intel's flag. Love a bit of sensationalism though, it doesn't make you look bonkers at all... honestly.
 
Intel aren't going under anytime soon, remember there's die hard lunatics like you, but flying Intel's flag. Love a bit of sensationalism though, it doesn't make you look bonkers at all... honestly.

What?
I don't touch an intel product and run away from them as far as possible.

86% sales share for AMD and 14% sales for intel at big retailers point exactly to bad times for intel.

For your information, I am right now building a new Athlon 64 4400+ X2 | 4GB DDR400 system, upgrade from Athlon 64 3700+ | 2GB DDR400. :D
 
Back
Top Bottom