Soldato
Obviously, but usually people dont give a crap about intel or nvidia, it's amd that attracts....fans.whats sad is being loyal to either company so it ends up effecting you lol
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Obviously, but usually people dont give a crap about intel or nvidia, it's amd that attracts....fans.whats sad is being loyal to either company so it ends up effecting you lol
Obviously, but usually people dont give a crap about intel or nvidia, it's amd that attracts....fans.
What? I don't. Especially nvidia, hate them with a passion. But if they make better products, I buy them. That's itI think because you favour intel and nvidia thats why it comes across that way
What? I don't. Especially nvidia, hate them with a passion. But if they make better products, I buy them. That's it
What? I don't. Especially nvidia, hate them with a passion. But if they make better products, I buy them. That's it
Of course, and I would do the same for amd or apple. I defend facts and reality, not a specific company. It's just that usually it's amd fans that make the craziest stuff up. I mean, there is the obvious 4070ti example, best priced card of this generation, but everyone lost their minds about it. In the same time, AMD charges you more for the 7900XT, LOLYou put a huge amount of energy running defence and advocacy for both Nvidia and Intel, you even defend Nvidia's pricing strategy, the extent to which you make arguments in favour of Intel or Nvidia are quite often frankly bonkers.
Im not defending it's value, im defending nvidia cause amd is worse when it comes to pricing this time around but there are hundreds of pages about nvidias pricing. I find it absurd.must have miss understood the way you seem to defend the value of the 4070ti ? I couldnt care which is slightly better offering because both are pricing them ridiculously Ideally I dont want anyone buying either of them and to give any positive spin on either wouldnt sit right with me
The 4070Ti is every bit as bad as the 7900XT.Of course, and I would do the same for amd or apple. I defend facts and reality, not a specific company. It's just that usually it's amd fans that make the craziest stuff up. I mean, there is the obvious 4070ti example, best priced card of this generation, but everyone lost their minds about it. In the same time, AMD charges you more for the 7900XT, LOL
7900xt and 4080, they both fight hard to win the spotThe 4070Ti is every bit as bad as the 7900XT.
What's the worst priced card? I suppose for you that is still the 7900XT, right?
And yet you seem to have unwittingly disproved that notion ...Obviously, but usually people dont give a crap about intel or nvidia, it's amd that attracts....fans.
7900xt and 4080, they both fight hard to win the spot
The issue is, 4080 / xtx are kinda halo products, so it doesn't matter as much. The XT is supposed to be the more affordable card, so I expected much better value from it. The XTX convincingly beats the 4080 in raster while costing less, which means the XTX is the better product for the user that doesn't care about RT or the rest of the nvidia features. I mean the raster / $ of the XTX is pretty good.
The XT on the other hand can't even do that properly, since it offers worse raster / $ than the 4070ti. That I consider nuts, since AMD is lagging behind RT and other features, you at least expect their cards to pummel nvidia in raster / $.
When you see me accusing amd of something that the court found them not guilty for, and then claim they were bribed on top of it to build a fab, you might have a pointAnd yet you seem to have unwittingly disproved that notion ...
How much faster or more expensive it is from the 3080 is irrelevant. I mean if the 3080 was a terrible card, then the 4080 would be 100% better than it. Effectively what your comparison does is punishing nvidia for releasing a great xx80 card last gen. I mean that's common sense.The 4080 isn't even much better in RT.
Its around 50% better in Raster and RT than the 3080 its replaced, while being over 70% more expensive, it has the honour of being the fist card ever, i think, to have a lower cost to performance ratio than the card its succeeded. It is in that sense the most important product in our world, and people like you want to detract our attention from it to an AMD product that it is a stretch to argue is worse than another of this generation of Nvidia products.
How much faster or more expensive it is from the 3080 is irrelevant. I mean if the 3080 was a terrible card, then the 4080 would be 100% better than it. Effectively what your comparison does is punishing nvidia for releasing a great xx80 card last gen. I mean that's common sense.
Again, what you think of the 3080 is irrelevant. Making comparisons like that is absurd cause instead of looking at the current product, you are basing it's value on the previous gen product. But if the previous gen product was HORRIBLE, then your current product will look great, even though it might be average.More mental gymnastics, this is what i'm talking about when i say "bonkers"
The 3080 was fairly priced for what it was, it was similar priced to its previous generations, it was nothing special, we are not talking about something that was unusually cheap and the 4080 is just bringing pricing normality back.
Its a terrible card for its money, you would actually use the word "shocking" to describe it, from £700 to £1200.