Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,874
- Location
- Surrey
Still nothing published. Have to be up at 5 screw this.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I think we've seen both ends of the rumour mill now. IMO it was never going to be Titan beating when both were clocked but I also don't think it will be as bad as implied in the latest rumours.
Somewhere in between is, for me, a given. Interesting points now relate to overclocking headroom. With the mass majority of Titans and 780s reaching 1200 ish and a good proportion going further... the real performance of both the 780 and Titan is far in excess of what is shown in normal benchmarks.
The 7950 was rightly heralded for it's massive OC headroom but the 780s have a pretty similar headroom in percentage terms. I wouldn't expect heralding on this forum for anything nVidia related but it is sometimes overlooked how much headroom GK110 has... Especially factoring in AB tweaks and custom bios.
First review up? I'll take anything I can get at this point ��
http://g.pconline.com.cn/x/363/3631256_all.html
it is sometimes overlooked how much headroom GK110 has... Especially factoring in AB tweaks and custom bios.
For the third time it is the first time![]()
^^ This, most I have seen are good for 1250mhz+. Even if 290X is faster @ stock, how much power use / cooling would it take to match the 780 performance @ 1250mhz?
I'm very happy with mine 1300mhz @ 55c on a £30 coolerDef keeping this beauty until 20nm.
All of this rumor stuff must be horrible for the guys that have pre-ordered...
I have no idea what you mean![]()
1100mhz 290x matches 7990 in many games.
at least according to someone at xtremeforums.
I call that awesome.
You've got absolutely no chance of that being true.
That link you posted has been posted twice already and you made it the third time it had been posted.![]()
First review up? I'll take anything I can get at this point ��
http://g.pconline.com.cn/x/363/3631256_all.html
Its not a review, its a Chinese forum member claiming to have one, its probably some guys 280X with a modified BIOS clocked up to the rafters.
The NDA lifting today was a rumour made up by review sites looking to generate traffic.
Whats funny that in the last 2 years,this will make AMD top or match the fastest single GPU Nvidia cards for the third time.
To put that in context AMD/ATI had only done this twice in the last five years.
1100mhz 290x matches 7990 in many games.
at least according to someone at xtremeforums.
I call that awesome.
The thing is...the 290X might not need to have huge overclocking headroom on the core clock, IF their memory clock was very overclockable, considering they are on 512 memory bus.^^ This, most I have seen are good for 1250mhz+. Even if 290X is faster @ stock, how much power use / cooling would it take to match the 780 performance @ 1250mhz?
I'm very happy with mine 1300mhz @ 55c on a £30 coolerDef keeping this beauty until 20nm.
All of this rumor stuff must be horrible for the guys that have pre-ordered...