• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Radeon R9 290X with Hawaii GPU pictured, has 512-bit 4GB Memory

No. When are you actually going to read results that have actually used voltage control? Seriously, stop spreading disinformation.

It's 95c at stock volts. God only knows what temps it will reach with added volts. Unless you're using LN2 for cooling this is not the GPU for a normal gamer / overclocker.

Hopefully the third party coolers will save the 290X some embarrassment and run cooler than 95C.

You have to see the hypocrisy, if Nvidia launched a hot card they would be flamed (See GTX 480)

AMD launch a 95C GPU and suddenly 95C is no problem, yeah great temps.

Logic has gone out of the window with this launch.
 
It's 95c at stock volts. God only knows what temps it will reach with added volts. Unless you're using LN2 for cooling this is not the GPU for a normal gamer / overclocker.

Hopefully the third party coolers will save the 290X some embarrassment and run cooler than 95C.

You have to see the hypocrisy, if Nvidia launched a hot card they would be flamed (See GTX 480)

AMD launch a 95C GPU and suddenly 95C is no problem, yeah great temps.

Logic has gone out of the window with this launch.

You're refusing to separate the GPU from the reference cooler, which is the least important part of it. It doesn't matter what temps it runs at, that's just showing cooler performance. Stick a cheap cooler on a 4770K and it'll hit 90C immediately.
 
The way I see it:

If you want POTENTIALLY the best performance, then get the 290X. (Note the capitalised bit! lol)

If you want the better allround card, get a GTX 780. (less heat/noise/power)

There are too many variables at present. IF mantle picks up, then it might turn out to be which games do you play. If Nvidia decide to do a massive driver overhaul like AMD did... then who knows. Constant bitching about it all gets us nowhere other than make you out to look all spiteful and obnoxious.

boomstick> Saw your post... and the bit about the 480 hypocrisy. Yes I get that fully, it's why I already mentioned it in this thread (I think it was this thread). Do you also belittle Intel chips because they can run hotter than AMD's? It will definitely have an impact of system temps, but don't go overboard with it, because that's what you are doing.
 
Last edited:
yep 95c is too hot. just like the 7990 on air a lot wont buy it for that very same reason and most who buy it watercool. if you water cooling a 290 does look better on stock cooling the 780 is better choice.

if nvidia change pricing quickly then the 780 will sell like hotcakes. in most reviews i seen id say they about on par just that the ati card is hotter.

so save 100 ish quid for a over in your pc or wait for few weeks for cooler card and same price 780 gtx. i know what i d be doing :D
 
Aftermarket cooling will still mean it will run at up to 95c at high loads, but higher clocks, unless the AIB's decide to set a lower temp target.
 
You're refusing to separate the GPU from the reference cooler, which is the least important part of it. It doesn't matter what temps it runs at, that's just showing cooler performance. Stick a cheap cooler on a 4770K and it'll hit 90C immediately.

Um, no you're just justifying it. Had Nvidia released a 95C GPU, the flaming would have been immense. It's AMD though so 95c is fine, Wonderful in fact.

I feel like I've entered the twilight zone where a new GPU that performs worse than ones that have been out for months, whilst consuming more power and operating at near boiling water temp is ok..

No more posts from me today lol, I'll come back later and hopefully sanity will be restored...
 
yep 95c is too hot. just like the 7990 on air a lot wont buy it for that very same reason and most who buy it watercool. if you water cooling a 290 does look better on stock cooling the 780 is better choice.

if nvidia change pricing quickly then the 780 will sell like hotcakes. in most reviews i seen id say they about on par just that the ati card is hotter.

so save 100 ish quid for a over in your pc or wait for few weeks for cooler card and same price 780 gtx. i know what i d be doing :D

It does the numbers but as an overall product the reference 290X seems properly iffy to me. I'll give some honest comparisons to a single Titan over the weekend
 
You're refusing to separate the GPU from the reference cooler, which is the least important part of it. It doesn't matter what temps it runs at, that's just showing cooler performance. Stick a cheap cooler on a 4770K and it'll hit 90C immediately.

Yea why dont he complain about Intels stockcooler more then?
I am sure he uses one...:p
 
yep 95c is too hot. just like the 7990 on air a lot wont buy it for that very same reason and most who buy it watercool. if you water cooling a 290 does look better on stock cooling the 780 is better choice.

if nvidia change pricing quickly then the 780 will sell like hotcakes. in most reviews i seen id say they about on par just that the ati card is hotter.

so save 100 ish quid for a over in your pc or wait for few weeks for cooler card and same price 780 gtx. i know what i d be doing :D

95C is definitely too hot. If it can run at that that's fine, but I wouldn't want it like that all the time. However, my GTX 480 did that without problem for a long time, and it wasn't as noisy as people made out (but sure did make the room toasty lol.)

I think you are hoping the 780 will get a price drop. Would be awesome if it did and would make the 780 a very good purchase... best cross your fingers.
 
There's no hoping needed, the 780 will get a price drop when the TI lands, how big that price drop is can be anyone's guess, they'll monitor sales over the next few weeks and make a decision based on that.
 
Back
Top Bottom