Caporegime
Oh my, let's hope this is not a new Vega...
If it was Vega it wouldn't keep up with a 4070 none Ti and use twice as much power.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Oh my, let's hope this is not a new Vega...
If it was Vega it wouldn't keep up with a 4070 none Ti and use twice as much power.
Exactly. Moreover what people don't get is that the scene in question can easily flip the results from one side winning to the other winning handily, so then which is the real result? We saw this particularly with Halo Infinite benchmarks (for Ampere vs RDNA 2) that were all over the place depending on the publication (and their scene choice). The truth is a lot of benchmark results are actually very misleading and not representative of overall gameplay. Mind you I'm not saying it's a deliberate or evil thing, it's just an issue of time, because hardware reviewers simply can't benchmark the whole game.If that made any sense we wouldn't see the 6900 XT and 3090 flipping like it does. This has nothing to do with RDNA3. But that doesn't help your narrative. Some games favour AMD and some favour Nvidia. Nothing more complicated about it.
The same issue if you wanted to RMA 3000 nvidia or 6000 series AMD when they released though. Some RMAs were generally months for those cards cause no stock.I get that but not if I had reply like this
"Thank you for your reply concerning your replacement request.
I understand you would like a replacement for your RX 7900 XTX. It's important to note that at this moment, we are unable to start the process for replacing your card, as we have no inventory available in our warehouses.
The replacement will be processed once the inventory has been replenished, this will take several weeks. If instead you prefer to receive a refund, we can process this refund immediately"
If that made any sense we wouldn't see the 6900 XT and 3090 flipping like it does. This has nothing to do with RDNA3. But that doesn't help your narrative. Some games favour AMD and some favour Nvidia. Nothing more complicated about it.
That is missing the fact that the ones that flip flop back and are bad for AMD are significantly worse this gen and not only a few % out but 10-15% out. So there still seems to be an issue for AMD on those titles specifically. Not suggesting they would be above like the previous games but the gap should be much tighter which would suggest a greater regression in those specific games at moment for AMD and likely meaning still not working as well as expected.If that made any sense we wouldn't see the 6900 XT and 3090 flipping like it does. This has nothing to do with RDNA3. But that doesn't help your narrative. Some games favour AMD and some favour Nvidia. Nothing more complicated about it.
My narrative? Am i a radeon fanboi or Nvidia? make your minds up guys or just stop with these extremist assumptions.
That is missing the fact that the ones that flip flop back and are bad for AMD are significantly worse this gen and not only a few % out but 10-15% out. So there still seems to be an issue for AMD on those titles specifically. Not suggesting they would be above like the previous games but the gap should be much tighter which would suggest a greater regression in those specific games at moment for AMD and likely meaning still not working as well as expected.
Working... not working....
or were you just posting some random benchmarks.
Who said anything about being a fanboy, a bit defensive there.
I mean we've now gone from something very tenuous to something even more tenuous. We shouldn't try and picture something we hope to see out of some noise.
lol, you don't even know the context of that do you?
I do, I know the post you are replying to. That's why I know the narrative.
Which post?
Lol, we gonna play this game of you trying to catch me out. The one right above the post you made. The one claiming there is more to unlock for RDNA3, the one you quoted.
Provide some real evidence next time instead of benchmarks which behave similarly for RDNA2.
Well, yeah.... you put your foot in it.Lol, we gonna play this game of you trying to catch me out.
The one right above the post you made. The one claiming there is more to unlock for RDNA3, the one you quoted.
It does make you wonder if AMD have forgotten that they had a dual issue architecture once before and moved away from it for good reason.
Well, yeah.... you put your foot in it.
No. Its a follow-on from this.
Lol, we gonna play this game of you trying to catch me out. The one right above the post you made. The one claiming there is more to unlock for RDNA3, the one you quoted.
Provide some real evidence next time instead of benchmarks which behave similarly for RDNA2.
People claiming AMD hardware is ahead of its time (or isn't optimised for yet) is nothing new. I've seen this story play out many times since GCN was first introduced.
What do you read in to this? what do you thing i'm saying here.Which is the one above your post...
It does make you wonder if AMD have forgotten that they had a dual issue architecture once before and moved away from it for good reason.
from what i see amd will have to offload more of the batching and scheduling work in software.. this needs a hardware revision like increasing the number of stages, expanding instruction buffers and that sort of thing.. amd has been using a simd architecture and relies on vectorization to manage workloads and utilization unlike nvidia which further adds to complexity.. its like they have extended cpu design philosophies to the gpu
I take it from your silence that it make sense to you now....