• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD RDNA3 unveiling event

The reference point for the dissapointment is not Nvidia. It's AMD.

They had enough product launches where the products released met, and often exceeded, the promises AMD made before hand.

Then, with RDNA3, they basically said "Haha! You suckers should have read the fine print!"

Did RDNA 3 even meet the 50% performance-per-watt increase? I suspect they have some scenario, somewhere, their lawyers can point to, (in the fine print) but I don't recall seeing it anywhere.

Are we at the point where we are now so used to Nvidia BS that we are accepting of it and instead direct our frustration at AMD?
 
Last edited:
My take is this:

The 7900XT is over priced, its a $750 GPU, not £900 that's a bad joke. Its also cynically named a 7900 series when what it actually is is a 7800XT.

The 7900XTX is fine, its the 6900XT replacement at the same money, i have no issue with that.
---------

RTX 4090, $100 more than the 3090 at $1600, ok fine that's not bad and it is a halo card, no problem with that.

RTX 4080 just like the 7900XT is overpriced, only even more so.

RTX 4070Ti, that's an RTX 4060Ti for 3080Ti money, utterly ###### disgusting!
 
The 7900XTX is fine, its the 6900XT replacement at the same money, i have no issue with that.
Its not really a 6900XT replacement though as that competed with the 3090, the 7900XTX only competes with the 80 even by AMDs own admission so its still a price rise of $350 over their 80 competitor from last gen.

What would AMD have done if Nvidia had built the 4080 on a AD102 die and priced it at $700?
 
Last edited:
My take is this:

The 7900XT is over priced, its a $750 GPU, not £900 that's a bad joke. Its also cynically named a 7900 series when what it actually is is a 7800XT.

The 7900XTX is fine, its the 6900XT replacement at the same money, i have no issue with that.
---------

RTX 4090, $100 more than the 3090 at $1600, ok fine that's not bad and it is a halo card, no problem with that.

RTX 4080 just like the 7900XT is overpriced, only even more so.

RTX 4070Ti, that's an RTX 4060Ti for 3080Ti money, utterly ###### disgusting!

Wow. When the likes of humbug think these products are priced right or only over priced by $100 or so, you know that these companies have done very well with conditioning people to the high prices.
 
Its not really a 6900XT replacement though as that competed with the 3090, the 7900XTX only competes with the 80 even by AMDs own admission so its still a price rise of $350 over their 80 competitor from last gen.

I can't argue with that, you're right, i still don't think its "bad" costs have gone up and yes i'm wiling and have actually extended the same curtsey to Nvidia.
 
My take is this:

The 7900XT is over priced, its a $750 GPU, not £900 that's a bad joke. Its also cynically named a 7900 series when what it actually is is a 7800XT.

The 7900XTX is fine, its the 6900XT replacement at the same money, i have no issue with that.
---------

RTX 4090, $100 more than the 3090 at $1600, ok fine that's not bad and it is a halo card, no problem with that.

RTX 4080 just like the 7900XT is overpriced, only even more so.

RTX 4070Ti, that's an RTX 4060Ti for 3080Ti money, utterly ###### disgusting!

4090 fe is £200 more than a 3090 FE UK price at current price and that's after the price was adjusted down due to "currency exchange rates" 4090 FE was what originally £1689 ? So really £289 more than the 3090fe was at the original price.. so I have a problem with that and a problem it is missing NVLINK. Basically a downgrade for pro users at more money. The 4090 isn't as great a deal as some think even if it was £1400 like the 3090FE was.

4080,4070ti ... well i'm not even going to go there as they are a clear rip off compared to previous generation, doubling in price over 2 years.. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
If we forget product names and instead compare based on performance relative to where the cards sit to 4090 compared to last gen parts then it looks something like this.

4090 +$100
4080 +$600
4070ti +$400

7900XTX +$350
7900XT +$320
 
My take is this:

The 7900XT is over priced, its a $750 GPU, not £900 that's a bad joke. Its also cynically named a 7900 series when what it actually is is a 7800XT.

The 7900XTX is fine, its the 6900XT replacement at the same money, i have no issue with that.
---------

RTX 4090, $100 more than the 3090 at $1600, ok fine that's not bad and it is a halo card, no problem with that.

RTX 4080 just like the 7900XT is overpriced, only even more so.

RTX 4070Ti, that's an RTX 4060Ti for 3080Ti money, utterly ###### disgusting!

you could also say the 7900xtx is an 7800xt card because its competing with the 4080 , pretty sure thats what it would have been called if nvidia priced the 4080 to the traditional 80 tier pricing , difficult to pick out who is worse from AMD / Nvidia in this generation
 
If we forget product names and instead compare based on performance relative to where the cards sit to 4090 compared to last gen parts then it looks something like this.

4090 +$100
4080 +$600
4070ti +$400

7900XTX +$350
7900XT +$320

So..

4090: $1499
4080: $599
4070Ti: $399

7900XTX $649
7900XT: $579

Beyond that...

4070: $349
4060Ti: $299
4060: $279

7800XT: $499
7800: $449
7700XT: $379
7700: $329
7600XT: $279
7600: $239

Yeah?
 
My take is this:

The 7900XT is over priced, its a $750 GPU, not £900 that's a bad joke. Its also cynically named a 7900 series when what it actually is is a 7800XT.

The 7900XTX is fine, its the 6900XT replacement at the same money, i have no issue with that.
---------

RTX 4090, $100 more than the 3090 at $1600, ok fine that's not bad and it is a halo card, no problem with that.

RTX 4080 just like the 7900XT is overpriced, only even more so.

RTX 4070Ti, that's an RTX 4060Ti for 3080Ti money, utterly ###### disgusting!

The problem is you're fine with the 7900xtx pricing and with 7900xt at theoretical $750 when AMD had high end prices much lower than that with more complex cards. So if you're fine with going up in pricing in some aspects, then you must accept all of it.

So..

4090: $1499
4080: $599
4070Ti: $399

7900XTX $649
7900XT: $579

Beyond that...

4070: $349
4060Ti: $299
4060: $279

7800XT: $499
7800: $449
7700XT: $379
7700: $329
7600XT: $279
7600: $239

Yeah?
Problably closer to what they should have been, although that top end card is still too expensive.
 
Last edited:
The reference point for the dissapointment is not Nvidia. It's AMD.

They had enough product launches where the products released met, and often exceeded, the promises AMD made before hand.

Then, with RDNA3, they basically said "Haha! You suckers should have read the fine print!"

Did RDNA 3 even meet the 50% performance-per-watt increase? I suspect they have some scenario, somewhere, their lawyers can point to, (in the fine print) but I don't recall seeing it anywhere.
If you're referring to presentation slides they're both guilty of that everyone seems to have forgotten the BS Nvidia pulled when it comes to the 4080 launch and claims made its buried in the now locked 4080 thread but its there people have either selective memories or very short ones
 
Last edited:
If you're referring to presentation slides they're both guilty of that everyone seems to have forgotten the BS Nvidia pulled when it comes to the 4080 launch and claims made its buried in the now locked 4080 thread but its there people have either selective memories or very short ones

You missed the part where I pointed out why we had some good will toward AMD with respect to this stuff, so I'll repost it:

They had enough product launches where the products released met, and often exceeded, the promises AMD made before hand.

Then, with RDNA3
, they basically said "Haha! You suckers should have read the fine print!"
 
The reference point for the dissapointment is not Nvidia. It's AMD.

They had enough product launches where the products released met, and often exceeded, the promises AMD made before hand.

Then, with RDNA3, they basically said "Haha! You suckers should have read the fine print!"

Did RDNA 3 even meet the 50% performance-per-watt increase? I suspect they have some scenario, somewhere, their lawyers can point to, (in the fine print) but I don't recall seeing it anywhere.
AMD cpus marketing department is fine. I might even say great. Always had been. It's the rtgi market dep that makes me throw up, it makes me not want to buy an amd card even if at some point they might end up being good.
 
Back
Top Bottom