Permabanned
I dont think chips without SMT should exist in this day and age tbh
This chip out performs yours.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I dont think chips without SMT should exist in this day and age tbh
This chip out performs yours.
Because its on newer architecture, its still pointless. The 3600 is far and away the better chip
Double the price better?
not really double, its 130 vs 200 isnt it?
Because its on newer architecture, its still pointless. The 3600 is far and away the better chip
Look at the gaming performance.. no faster and in most games slower.. and double the price. Your right 3600 all the way
Purely in a gaming sense.. For everything else 3600 stomps. Nobody cares about single threaded chips anymore, which is why they're barely sold
Sounding like a novice here.
A 3500X offer massive value vs. any other CPU at this price point, and SMT doesn't offer 100% more performance vs the cores it is attached to. Why do you think the i7 9700K is so popular vs the 9900K? SMT/HT isn't work £xxx pounds for most folk. And when you are at the lower end of the market where every £ counts, then SMT is way less valuable than other options that could be upgraded.
SMT is a nice to have if it is being offered with no cost, or a small cost added not double the cost.
I see what you're saying, but I'm talking about everyday use not just gaming.. In which case SMT is massively helpful. Obviously not as simple as "double threads = double performance" but the jump is big enough.
The main reason to get one would be the price as its good value I admit, but then again so would a 4 core processor be? Point is its not really enough in todays day
I wasn't talking at all about gaming, from my point-of-view that its the least important activity, yet the most argued about.
Why would you buy a 4 core processor? When one with 50% more cores cost the same?
I could bring some in but we were an AMD partner they’d not want us selling it.
4 cores would cost less...
Cant you turn off multithreading on a 3600 in the bios,?
I remember the i7 920 being similar in games with hyperthreading disabled
The 3500x is £100 with shipping costs (providing customs dont sting you)
The 3600 can be had for £142 again if customs dont sting you
Is it worth it?
I'm also curious - has anyone bought a 3500x from China and, if so, what were custom's fees, if any, and are you satisfied with the buy?
The 3500x is £100 with shipping costs (providing customs dont sting you)
The 3600 can be had for £142 again if customs dont sting you
Is it worth it?