Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
No, just everything at default other than XMP, did a recent BIOS update.
I'm pretty sure they learned from feedback of AM4 so first generation AM5 boards won't have problems like BIOS size in the future, x300 was released in the era when AMD were still gaining reputation and motherboard manufacturers dind't invest heavily into AMD platforms, thigs are very different today and x600 is looking very powerful.
Windows thing then still?
Is that still an issue with windows? I thouight they'd vastly improved that sort of thing with =>win10 ?
The problem comes when random issues pop up and people blame drivers or certain hardware manufacturers etc. I don't think it's a coincidence that if you run stock, clean install and up-to-date drivers/BIOS/chipset that you get very few if any issues. The more variables you introduce the more chance of problems
I went from 8700K->5800X, so mobo and CPU changed, without issue and that was Win10 at the time. It's like who swears by running DDU before every GPU driver update. I'd rather have my PC back up and running in minutes than spend days of getting things back to the way they were.
Aren't you introducing more variables if you are starting from scratchThe problem comes when random issues pop up and people blame drivers or certain hardware manufacturers etc. I don't think it's a coincidence that if you run stock, clean install and up-to-date drivers/BIOS/chipset that you get very few if any issues. The more variables you introduce the more chance of problems
Nope, you've got an operating system as intended. If you use an old one full of all sorts of carp who knows what mess is in there. No-one validates for that. Plenty of third party software has been shown to cause issues over the years. Less is more in this caseAren't you introducing more variables if you are starting from scratch
I just have to agree to disagree and know that I am correctNope, you've got an operating system as intended. If you use an old one full of all sorts of carp who knows what mess is in there. No-one validates for that. Plenty of third party software has been shown to cause issues over the years. Less is more in this case
When you think about it logically you will too
Both of your slides are cpu bound. You can check the cpu game graph, thats exactly how much fps your cpu can get regardless of a cpu bottleneck. You can also check the gpu bound report, at low settings its sitting at 1%, at high settings its at 51%I just ran it again and weirdly..... i have a 50Mhz CPU overclock, it doesn't make this much difference
Graphics Lowest: 184 FPS
Graphics Highest: 142 FPS
From Slide:
12700K: 156 FPS
12600K: 156 FPS
5800X: 152 FPS
Ok so highest settings, its 100% GPU locked at this point, and the RTX 3070 is what, 35% faster? So the slide i posted is clearly CPU bound, i'll be interested to see what you get @Dicehunter
Your Cinebench temps are actually very good for a 5800X3D so I'd say that's normal.
Maybe with a proper desktop version of Steam OS. We need a big gaming company like Valve pushing it to really get the adoption and the support from the hardware and software companies.
I've seen a video where this was tested (sorry - couldn't find it - I did look) and the verdict was that switching platforms (i.e. intel -> AMD) and keeping the Windows install does hurt overall performance (it was around 4% in gaming if I recall correctly).
I went from 8700K->5800X, so mobo and CPU changed, without issue and that was Win10 at the time. It's like who swears by running DDU before every GPU driver update. I'd rather have my PC back up and running in minutes than spend days of getting things back to the way they were.
