Soldato
Nevermind, misread.
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Poll: AMD Screws Gamers: Sponsorships Likely Block DLSS
- Thread starter RavenXXX2
- Start date
Soldato
By not supporting your hardware through drivers until you feel like it.
The 10 series were out for years before they enabled support for non module panels.
Last edited:
Soldato
That is just good business and why they are so successful and dominate the dGPU market
Soldato
Wouldn't it be good business from AMD to block DLSS then?That is just good business and why they are so successful and dominate the dGPU market
Soldato
But they are the good guys and do no wrong, consumers champion
But they are the good guys and do no wrong, consumers champion
Or so they have some believing anyway
Soldato
So MLID has wade in on this topic and said the lack of DLSS in titles that also feature FSR is due to the fact the game development team hasn't had the budget increase to ensure that Nvidia's tech is rolled out on release with recent AAA games and instead they've help promote the story that AMD is somehow responsible to blocking the implementation of DLSS.
Not sure what to believe, FSR is likely already coded into the game engine from the console development and from a developers POV it doesn't make sense to artificially delay or block DLSS for PC releases, nobody stands to gain from it.
Not sure what to believe, FSR is likely already coded into the game engine from the console development and from a developers POV it doesn't make sense to artificially delay or block DLSS for PC releases, nobody stands to gain from it.
Or maybe lots of people realise that AMD can be far from angels but if they were thrown into a pit with Nvidia then AMD might still come out smelling of roses.But they are the good guys and do no wrong, consumers champion
That is, there is good, various shades of grey, bad, evil, and then the number #1 skulduggery company, Nvidia.
To get such a reputation takes decades of practice!
Last edited:
People still believe what mlid says despite always being wrong
After seeing the fake outrage all over the net by Nvidia fans who probably haven't even tried FSR2 in many cases, I can believe some of it. I've tested FSR2 and the DLSS mod and can't really fault FSR2 at the 1440P resolution & 75% scale I play at. Sure it will be worse at 1080P Performance but if you have to play at that setting then perhaps think of upgrading your system.
People forget that Nvidia is the one who started all this sponsorship malarky with TWIMTP and Gameworks. It would have been great if devs included TressFX alongside Hairworks in The Witcher 3 for example, but I suspect sponsorship got in the way back then but surprise surprise, no one made such a big fuss.
Soldato
But they are the good guys and do no wrong, consumers champion
We all know comparitavely that NV is anticonsumer and AMD is pro consumer.That is just good business and why they are so successful and dominate the dGPU market
Why anyone champions anti consumerism as a positive in these conversations is mind numbing.
Uh huh - Starfield was updated with dlss within literally 2 hours after launch by one person
And MLID wants me to believe it's because multi billion dollar AAA game developers don't have enough money to implement dlss... looks like MLID will be getting a nice bonus Christmas gift this year from Lisa for all the shilling
Last edited:
It's not like amd have any choice when:
- have what 10% of the market?
- are last to the market by several months or years
- last to the market and with a lesser/subpar option
Don't think amd have taken the path for the greater good of the "community".
If they really want to make a difference then put their focus on consoles and get fsr 2 in more than just 3 games or whatever it is now
Or better yet, come up with their own solution for something new and needed and lead the way.
Last edited:
How can anyone believe that even for a second when is beyond me tbh.
They’d both smell the same. Just the fact that people think otherwise shows their bias.
AMD cultivating that victim mentality works well for them.
Last edited:
Soldato
It's not a great implementation though, just watch HUB most video on Starfield and there's glitching and artifacting that you wouldn't normally get with 1st party implementations.Uh huh - Starfield was updated with dlss within literally 2 hours after launch by one person
And MLID wants me to believe it's because multi billion dollar AAA game developers don't have enough money to implement dlss... looks like MLID will be getting a nice bonus Christmas gift this year from Lisa for all the shilling
You think so?
I guess you also think since all "politicians are at it" then voting for known liars and fraudsters avoids future disappointment? AKA the naive notion that things can't get any worse!
Nvidia invented "consumer focus groups"
Nvidia paid for exclusive for decades.
And more dirty tricks they have done in the last 30 years.
Yes, if AMD had 80% of the GPU market they too might play dirty but until such as they do play equally dirty, then corporate "morality" (for what little is worth) does mean something. Of course, any company playing dirty will eventually drag the whole market down.
It's not like amd have any choice when:
- have what 10% of the market?
- are last to the market by several months or years
- last to the market and with a lesser/subpar option
Don't think amd have taken the path for the greater good of the "community".
If they really want to make a difference then put their focus on consoles and get fsr 2 in more than just 3 games or whatever it is now
Unreal that people see AMD in such good light.
Soldato
HUBs vid is already a version behind as the FG mod is still in beta.
DLSS2 is fine and was the one out hours after launch, by two different people using different methods of injection.