Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Someone else released one that's free tbf.
Oh look
Starfield’s Most Popular Mod Sparks Paywall Controversy, Immediately Gets Pirated
A mod adding support for Nvidia's latest upscaling tech gets locked behind a $5 subscriptionkotaku.com
Is there anything like this for Nvidia sponsored titles? I'm curious how they compare.
Do devs have to pay Nvidia to include DLSS? I don't know if there are any factors beyond just exclusivity agreements/spite
Regardless of which side of the fence you fall on this topic, upscaling tech is the best thing to happen to AAA devs because it means they can shovel their **** out the door with even less quality control than usual, and that was already a staggeringly low bar.
You said above the free version was buggy as hell. Free is good but bug free is better. I would just play with no mod but it seems those that wanted Dlss were not bothered about paying the $5.
Maybe AMD should hire him to get their FSR3 out
Nah i don't care about either tech but those on here were really happy to be getting Dlss.Hmm. That doesn't sound right. If so you should be buying Nvidia and not being a loyal AMD fan
I feel you are being a bit disingenuous here. Your conclusion seems to be going straight to foul play without taking into consideration that as much as FSR and DLSS are similar(they set out to achieve the same goal) they are offered up completely different. One is locked to one vendor and the other provides near the same result and is available to everyone. In the end what matters is the man hours a development team is able to spare and if you have 2 solutions with almost the same end result why would you spend your time on the one that alienates roughly a fourth of your possible install base? I'm not saying AMD has never done shady things, cause they have and been caught with their hands in the cookiejar but this is just a bit of overreaching atm IMHO. I could flip the argument fairly easy. Maybe the reason for those nvidia sponsored titles to have FSR is because the devs want the entire install base covered where as they didn't see the need most of the time on the AMD sponsored titles as everybody was already covered by FSR even if its slightly inferior in a proper implementation. There is no smoking gun yet. If you can get that then you might be on to something but until that happens its all just speculation.Yup, same sheet with nvidia too:
Paints quite the picture eh
And nope, devs don't have to pay to use dlss, it is free and even integrated into the majority of game engines which makes it easier and quicker to add.
But yup sadly last point is very true
Bethesda and better HDR? Try ANY HDR. Starfield doesn't even have it on PC. Trash.
Again where is the smoking gun? All you have posted are speculations from different people/outlets not cold hard facts. If this John person you write about have put forward proper evidence then why not just link/share that instead? then this discussion would be over.Foul play? Noi smoking gun? It's been confirmed by John that 3 devs on seperate game(s) have stated they had to "remove" dlss due to sponsorship, I can't see him making that up, he's not MLID material..... And as said, the whole thing and that image speaks a thousand words, again, gamer nexus summed it up perfectly (and they ain't exactly nvidia bias given their very controversial content that got them black listed by nvidia and they called them out for this)
Why not implement all 3, let the customers choose what works best based on their setup?
FSR is nowhere near as good as dlss, people say this all the time and sorry but it just ain't so (not just based on my testing but hubs, tpu, df, oc3d, gamer nexus etc.), especially at resolutions lower than 4k and if using any of the lower presets (and this is becoming more necessary now and will only be more common going forward on older gpus), again, it just smacks of amds "we know what is best for you, it's our way or the highway"
In terms of speed and covering user base, fsr and dlss is extremely easy and quick to implement, more so if the game already has a TAA based AA in it (which 99% of games do now), even according to amds very own guide, if a game has dlss, it's even quicker for devs to implement fsr:
This is not some huge piece of work that needs a proposal and to go through multiple meetings/stages to get planned for, a junior/intern could easily do it (especially since dlss doesn't require as much fine tuning per game to get good results like fsr does)
Sounds like the new version of 'trust me bro'Foul play? Noi smoking gun? It's been confirmed by John that 3 devs on seperate game(s) have stated they had to "remove" dlss due to sponsorship, I can't see him making that up, he's not MLID material..... And as said, the whole thing and that image speaks a thousand words, again, gamer nexus summed it up perfectly (and they ain't exactly nvidia bias given their very controversial content that got them black listed by nvidia and they called them out for this)
Why not implement all 3, let the customers choose what works best based on their setup?
FSR is nowhere near as good as dlss, people say this all the time and sorry but it just ain't so (not just based on my testing but hubs, tpu, df, oc3d, gamer nexus etc.), especially at resolutions lower than 4k and if using any of the lower presets (and this is becoming more necessary now and will only be more common going forward on older gpus), again, it just smacks of amds "we know what is best for you, it's our way or the highway"
In terms of speed and covering user base, fsr and dlss is extremely easy and quick to implement, more so if the game already has a TAA based AA in it (which 99% of games do now), even according to amds very own guide, if a game has dlss, it's even quicker for devs to implement fsr:
This is not some huge piece of work that needs a proposal and to go through multiple meetings/stages to get planned for, a junior/intern could easily do it (especially since dlss doesn't require as much fine tuning per game to get good results like fsr does)
