Associate
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2017
- Posts
- 1,923
That such a click bait piece of crap. HUB are embarrassing themselves.Not a good look for AMD.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That such a click bait piece of crap. HUB are embarrassing themselves.Not a good look for AMD.
We're way past that point. It was over the moment the tech media started widely shilling DLSS, a proprietary, vendor-locked technology, as being a Good Thing™ for PC gaming. Now it's just widely accepted that you're a moron if you didn't buy an Nvidia card, because why would you limit yourself to FSR and XeSS when you could have all three? Nvidia have successfully shifted the conversation beyond whether DLSS is a Good Thing™ or not, which is something they never managed to achieve with any of the stuff they've shoved into games that only works on their cards in the past. There was always pushback against things like GameWorks and PhysX. Now we get manufactured outrage like this when a game doesn't have proprietary technology that only works on one vendor's cards included in it. Jensen won. Get over it.And there's the problem, if we tolerate this crap things will never change and only get worse.
As the vendor not on the consoles (well ignoring the Switch), and who has the better upscaler (all those tensor sensors better not be wasted on consumer GPUs or the PCMR would surely pitfork them like the age old "I don't want an iGPU on my Intel K CPUs"), then surely it is Nvidia who should be writing the super easy wrapper for game devs to use to ensure that once a game comes to PC it can use DLSS?Then the remaining 10% does seem to become an either/or.
This just circles back to the old shocker of a company just doing the bare minimum it needs to that covers the most bases and then moving on.
they both at it. put the fanboyism to one side, hud showed this, clearly there are games on either side that have been sponsered wiith no fsr/dlss. seems some folk are taking nvidia at their word that they dont block. when clearly some nvidia sponsored titles as missing fsr.
as i said before they both as bad as one another. what i find amusing is that folk are actually believing a trillon dollar company thats has a history ofscrewing gamers in the past and here and now.
AMD is anti consumer actively blocking dlss, that is all there is to it, and people should not be making excuses for it. AMD deserves all the stick they are getting.
where is the proof that AMD is blocking DLSS? All I've seen is **** poor research, **** poor journalism, over reaction from nvidia fan boys. It's hilarious to watch.
Get one FF16 and GOW Ragnarok are better than anything the PC has to offer if you want a good story. If you are a gamer and not a master racer you are missing out if you don't have a ps5. FF16 looks great and the story and boss fights are off the charts good. Would i like more fps yea it would be good but once i get locked into the story and game play it's not an issue as i ain't a snob.Console looking more attractive every week.
The only proof is it's not in the game. The game has an upscaler that works for all gamers. It does not need DLSS which is propriety for a small amount of users. You gotta love these sites for trying to get more subscribers. AMD paid money to the developers and give everyone an upscaling option but are some how the bad guys here.where is the proof that AMD is blocking DLSS? All I've seen is **** poor research, **** poor journalism, over reaction from nvidia fan boys. It's hilarious to watch.
The only proof is it's not in the game. The game has an upscaler that works for all gamers. It does not need DLSS which is propriety for a small amount of users. You gotta love these sites for trying to get more subscribers. AMD paid money to the developers and give everyone an upscaling option but are some how the bad guys here.
so no proof then.
What is your suggestion then, Boycott companies? .Because I do not imagine that will gain a lot of traction, we are a small minority and the majority just buy games/hardware and have no idea of what is going on.And there's the problem, if we tolerate this crap things will never change and only get worse.
well no it isn't. there are more titles without FSR that have DLSS than the other way around. There is no proof of anything. Just shows how fanatical fan boys areThe proof is in the pudding, as the sayIng goes, and at the moment, the pudding has no DLSS.
DLSS is not a requirement though. Only for a small amount of users does it matter. As above RTX cards are still a big minority and AMD cover all the other bases including RTX cards.The proof is in the pudding, as the sayIng goes, and at the moment, the pudding has no DLSS.
creation engine was CPU bound, don't know if this new iteration is.It would be quite hilarious,if Starfield launches and still does better on Nvidia cards!
AMD are bundling the game with their CPUs,which is weird.
Have a PC and a console if you want to play all the good games. I not long ago finished the new Zelda game and the switch ain't a power house but the game was great.Buy consoles instead?