• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD VEGA confirmed for 2017 H1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't waste ur breath on trolls, seriously this guy is like broken tape lol Same hatred anti-amd posts over and over... One would think that he can actually get bored and drop it but no....

Nah i can understand the lack of faith.
AMD pretty much playing catchup since tge 780ti, tgey just tried to follow NV.
So they need to prove themself in the eyes of many.

IMHO with this (pulling a whole new architecture while NV just brought Paxwell) they can leapfrog back in tha came, and erase that one step lag they had.
 
Nah, I'll buy a Vega card. I'll take the top most one they have. I'm done with NVIDIA for a while.

I was excited for the 1080, the reveal show was amazing, then they revealed their new pricing.

Not a chance I'm paying more for a 1080, than I did my Superclocked EVGA 980Ti's; and I bought those on their launch day.

So VEGA for me, even if it's just below the 1080 on launch. I do hope AMD have a much better card though, but only rebellions are built on hope.

Yer, I understand where you are coming from and even I am starting to find it hard to justify spending over £500 for a top end card. I also hope that Vega does give the 1080 and TXP a good hiding and comes in at a decent price. It would help us consumers in the long run.
 
I think quite the contrary.
AMD pretty much ditched last year to work on Vega, and bring out a completely new architecture, with all the bells and whistles, higher clocks, and to shake off the faults of its predecessor, instead of polishing the already 5 years old GCN and bring out a bit better one as NV did with Pascal.

They have all the chance to beat Pascal now and get back in the game.

Just look at Ryzen, it looks to shape up to be a real competitor, already beating 6900K in benches and in clock speeds, and the same was said about it " it will be no good etc" (ofc i know there are no real reviews yet, but as i heard from devs, it is seem to be a very good CPU).

AMD throw in everything this time, not just the baby steps they used to in the last few years.

I hope you are right bud and I genuinely mean that but I don't think so. Sure, showing a 4K vid of Battlefront and Doom does look good indeed against a 1080 but looking at the big picture, I can see NVidia cutting prices when Vega launches and then bringing out a top end 1080Ti that claims back the title of 'fastest GPU' but again, I would rather you was right over me this time.
 
I have gotten reeled into the hype time and time again. You almost expect the let down now. Saying that I think this chip will be at least 50/50 against the 1080 in dx11 but likely more, just because the 1080 isn't very good IMO. Not a huge step up from the 980ti and a Fury X has all but closed the gap. So in theory it shouldn't take much more for them to eke out enough performance to beat the 1080.
The 1080ti will soundly beat it.
 
Yes in Vulkan, which how many games are out using, and we all know AMD get a big boost from Vulkan, so if it needed to be running that to get to the 1080, its not looking good is it.

That's simply unrealistic. If you follow your train of thought you are effectively suggesting that AMD have made zero technological progress from Polaris. So much so that they would have been better off simply scaling up Polaris to get to gtx1080 performance than overhaul their architecture to alleviate weaknesses in prior GCN iterations (and that all the effort has been for nothing).
 
Im sorry, but having to be running Vulkan to get it at the 1080, it just doesn't excite me one bit, considering the amount of Vulkan games we got.

To get it at the 1080? There's no 1080 I can buy right now running at 2250Mhz out of the box, it's not a standard card. It's also well above the average max OC of 2050mhz most people.

I personally don't care what a GPU "could" OC to, I don't need that hassle for production and work systems; along with gaming. I only care for out of the box performance.

When I owned my 980Ti's and had issues, I was constantly told to drop my, OC, it's the OC. I never OC'd, and yet that's the general response in the NVIDIA driver forum I always got; until I ended up simply selling my cards. As it was clearly another issues with Maxwell, drivers, along with Adobe and Solidworks.

As it is, VEGA looks promising, and beats the 1080 in DOOM so far.
For yourself, and more of the minority OC'ing might be the only thing to look at. It's just that though, a minority, even smaller, than the market for top end GPUs.

I just want a decenl'y fast card I can buy and plop in, out of the box that suits my needs, and delivers performance.

Hopefully VEGA lives up to what people expect; but it really is silly comparing it to a halo 1080 that's a minorty of even overclocked 1080's out there; considering most hit that 2050Mhz limit.
Now if there were 2250Mhz 1080's Sold right now, at the very moment; that never dipped below that "base" factory OC; then it would be a card to actually care about.

As it is; I don't see how anyone can make the claim "VEGA 10 is only barely able to match the 1080" and actually mean it.

Yer, I understand where you are coming from and even I am starting to find it hard to justify spending over £500 for a top end card. I also hope that Vega does give the 1080 and TXP a good hiding and comes in at a decent price. It would help us consumers in the long run.

What really gets under my skin, is that the 1080 isn't a top end card. It would have been called the 1060 only a few years ago. That was until NVIDIA launched the 680, which was actually their midrange card.

I even bought that on launch day, it offered the performance I wanted at the time compared to the more expensive 7970. Sadly I only fed into their money pit, but then buying the 980, then the Titan X, and then two 980Tis. I helped contribute to the current issues; and honestly couldn't bring myself to do that with the 1080.

I almost go the new Titan X as well, only thing stopping me was that they refused to sell to Ireland. So now I'll just get the top VEGA card; hoping AMD's new tech is finally what they actually need to compete not only on price, but also performance.

Can't say I miss G-Sync anymore either; not since they released ReLive; that finally supports Borderless Window FreeSync.
 
Last edited:
Half the problem is people whining about the cost constantly then still buying it time and time again.
 
Half the problem is people whining about the cost constantly then still buying it time and time again.

Welcome to life. I whine about my job but still go to it, I whine about the weather but don't emigrate, I whine about my tea being **** but still drink it, I whine about mates but still go out with them... Etc etc :D
 
The high end Vega cards are going to be expensive -

HBM2 memory

Large memory capacity

Large GPU chips

Having said that if the performance is there and I can afford it I will pay the asking price.
 
I have gotten reeled into the hype time and time again. You almost expect the let down now. Saying that I think this chip will be at least 50/50 against the 1080 in dx11 but likely more, just because the 1080 isn't very good IMO. Not a huge step up from the 980ti and a Fury X has all but closed the gap. So in theory it shouldn't take much more for them to eke out enough performance to beat the 1080.
The 1080ti will soundly beat it.

I'd say that as well... if Vega used GCN 1.3, but it uses NCU which contains some substantial improvements over GCN including tile based rendering and also a new memory architecture. A Polaris card with the same 4096 shaders as the Fury X and GDDR5X would give the 1080 a run for it's money, a card with NCU and HBM2 should trounce it.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to life. I whine about my job but still go to it, I whine about the weather but don't emigrate, I whine about my tea being **** but still drink it, I whine about mates but still go out with them... Etc etc :D

You drink bad tea?! Disgraceful! :mad:

I could understand the 1080 or Titan X....but willingly drinking bad tea....
 
The high end Vega cards are going to be expensive -

HBM2 memory

Large memory capacity

Large GPU chips

Having said that if the performance is there and I can afford it I will pay the asking price.

£300-£350 is my budget... I'm expecting Big Vega to cost twice that.

And no matter how much money I can afford, I just won't spend that kind of bucks on a GPU, out of principle!

I just don't want to see PC gaming get ever more expensive each year. It's already getting to the point where if you want an upgrade, you have to spend 1.5x what your last card cost you.
 
£300-£350 is my budget... I'm expecting Big Vega to cost twice that.

And no matter how much money I can afford, I just won't spend that kind of bucks on a GPU, out of principle!

I just don't want to see PC gaming get ever more expensive each year. It's already getting to the point where if you want an upgrade, you have to spend 1.5x what your last card cost you.

+1. I brought a 680 for £380 on release and never again. I'm hoping VEGA is great but a 1070 popped up for £300 the other day and I jumped because with HBM2 and the interposer etc I just not sure VEGA will beat that performance/price point.

Might match it but I thought why wait? My 290 I upgraded from though will be one of my best ever Pc purchases
 
Half the problem is people whining about the cost constantly then still buying it time and time again.

Yup, we all know whos fault it is for Nvidias high prices, its ours, been said time and time again, so all i can say is, fair play to em, we can't knock them for just giving us what we want :)
 
Yup, we all know whos fault it is for Nvidias high prices, its ours, been said time and time again, so all i can say is, fair play to em, we can't knock them for just giving us what we want :)

I thought I was silly buying the 7950GX2 when it launched; then even sillier getting the 8800 GTX, and then 8800 Ultra.

Yet I bought a Titan X (Maxwell)...

So many of us complaining put ourselves in this situation. Always wanting the top, the best, and willing to pay.

Wish there were more than 2 people in the GPU race really, same for CPUs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom