• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD VEGA confirmed for 2017 H1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well Vega at GTX 1070 performance in general better have improved minimums at least. 580 still hanging in there. :p

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQz7sklvvy0
a15bd56da8ce47e2a312ddecf5283a24.png
99 fps Vs 81 average (1070 is 20% faster on the aveages) is pretty good for the 580. That game is a total stunner as well and shocked to see such good performance from a UBISoft game!
 
The best way for this to work would be having a card that is half way between the 1070 & 1080, competing with the 1070 on price. That is one of the biggest market segments, and would make it a lot more difficult for Nvidia just to cut the price of the 1080, as they would also then have to trash the price on the 1070.

No matter what is said, I buy solely on price to performance, when the price isn't exorbitant so if Vega has a card that is fast and cheaper than the 1080 after the dust settles then I'll add one of those, rather than an additional 1080, depending on its compute performance. :)

Yeah thats true. slot them in between 1070-80 and 1080-80Thai would make sense.
 
My brain is just very very confused at the moment.

Waiting patiently for Vega, but at the end of the day I am more comfortable with Nvidia. But I now own a Ryzen.... ahhh the confusion!!

Buying Vega locks me out of the Nvidia ecosystem due to monitor upgrade which will happen at the same time.

Have AMD turned a corner? Is Vega gong to be the start of something new from them? They seem to be on the right road with Ryzen....

For example if I had been a 290/390 owner and had a Freesync monitor waiting until now to get a proper upgrade would have been painful.

Then again.... I currently have a 970 with a crappy monitor that tears like crazy so i am already in that situation....

I just hate the fact that a monitor purchase locks me in to the Green or Red ecosystem.
For world problems eh? :p
 
99 fps Vs 81 average (1070 is 20% faster on the aveages) is pretty good for the 580. That game is a total stunner as well and shocked to see such good performance from a UBISoft game!

Aye, but the same minimums essentially, surprised by that actually. Figured the 1070 would be 20% faster there as well.

Truth be told, I got the game on launch when I still had two 980Tis, and the performance wasn't that great. Ubisoft's team has done a fantastic job on it, especially in their DX12 path as well.

In 1080p with a single 980Ti i use to average around mid 60's with game maxed.
 
Again....... go and look at the links on the rainforest:

1. is a 3rd party seller through them with "only" 8 ratings in their life time, granted it is fulfilled by said company but I know for a fact that I still wouldn't touch from a seller with so few reviews that happen to look dodgy with their wording, if people know anything about "fake" reviews, they will know what to look for and what to avoid, amazon is by far the worst for this unfortunately, which is why there are so many "fakespot" sites dedicated to outing "fake" reviews i.e.

http://fakespot.com/

2. the other non-deal prices are through other countries/abroad, good prices but have fun with warranty etc. claims and the main thing that makes this even more stupid is that it is comparing a different currency....

I have found all the other deals that people are posting about (except for the sites where you can get a "new" 1080 for <£400 that isn't via some kind of deal....) and yup some are reputable/well reviewed sites but they are "deals", not the standard going rate, which is what people should be using if they want to compare like for like when it comes to price to performance for upcoming vega, which is what this discussion has been all about but people think that deals or/and buying from other countries i.e. in another currency is the "normal" going rate for a 1080 in the UK/pound lel....

Feel free to trust message me all of these epic standard 1080's going for <£440, that aren't

- through another country
- isn't via a voucher code, limited time deal or limited time cashback

Even looking on sites like pricespy, the 1080s that I looked at are above £450 except one but again you have to buy it through USA....

It keeps being said that the places we are seeing 1080s sell for £400 are not reputable...

Yes they are reputable sites, jut because you can't find them, doesn't make them not reputable. eg the rainforest lol.

Whilst I agree that AMD are not going to price their products against "one off deals" eg below the rrp, it isn't relevant. If I can buy a 1080 for £400 and Vega costs £450, I'm buying the 1080. That isn't my problem as the consumer, that is AMDs problem. Comparing RRP means nothing if they are selling at completely different prices. The only price that matters is what I can buy it for.

I understand you arguably might need to use RRP when comparing price to performance ratio, but even then, that's questionable.

See above.

But that is what this discussion started out about....

price to performance based on RRP i.e. like for like

It is pointless comparing a special one off deal that is currently on literally a handful of sites (of which most are not "normal" i.e. going to buy stuff from abroad.....). Heck you will probably be able to get vega for £50 cheaper than anywhere in the UK through another country too but do you really want the hassle for any future issues that could very well arise? For myself, no thanks and I imagine most people on here would rather buy from a retailer located in the UK with great customer service, which is why many stick to retailers such as ocuk.
 
Last edited:
Im heading to USA in November. Assuming VEGA is out by then. Is there much to be saved from buying out there? (Assuming no UK taxes, shipping etc)
 
Im heading to USA in November. Assuming VEGA is out by then. Is there much to be saved from buying out there? (Assuming no UK taxes, shipping etc)

You are allowed to bring back up to £390 of 'souvenirs' duty and tax free from the U.S.A. So you'll save about 30%
 
You are allowed to bring back up to £390 of 'souvenirs' duty and tax free from the U.S.A. So you'll save about 30%
Even If I was to buy something more expensive. I've honestly in the last 15 years of traveling several times a year NEVER been pulled to the side by customs coming from USA. Only once, and it was coming back from Dubai. So... you know...
 
I just gave you the average price at £470. That is taken from the lowest price card for the 1080 across 10+ companies via google and then working out the average.

There is no way Nvidia can just lop of £70 from their RRP in response. It doesn't work that way.
It absolutely works like that. I think you've
been caught up in the hype of expensive to buy = expensive to manufacture.

They've done it before when they had to with the GTX 200 series cards.
 
Whilst I agree that AMD are not going to price their products against "one off deals" eg below the rrp, it isn't relevant. If I can buy a 1080 for £400 and Vega costs £450, I'm buying the 1080. That isn't my problem as the consumer, that is AMDs problem. Comparing RRP means nothing if they are selling at completely different prices. The only price that matters is what I can buy it for.

I understand you arguably might need to use RRP when comparing price to performance ratio, but even then, that's questionable.

Exactly. People don't care about manufacturer margins, about retail costs, about development costs. They only care what's it going to cost to get the performance/features they want. If Nvidia has made lots of money with 1080 for the year they had a clear market, and can now afford to cut prices and offer that performance for a lot less than AMD (who have not yet made their money back on their Vega investment), then customers will flock to them. Most people will find it difficult to pay a premium for AMD over a price-cut Nvidia card, just because AMD needs to make their money back. That doesn't concern the consumer. It's up to AMD to add value, and price a product based on the reality of the market's current landscape, not what they would like to charge, or what they could have charged if they'd brought out Vega a year ago.
 
Even if you could save say £50-100 by buying via USA or wherever, do you really want to take that chance knowing the hassle you could possibly face down the line should any issues arise?
 
Even if you could save say £50-100 by buying via USA or wherever, do you really want to take that chance knowing the hassle you could possibly face down the line should any issues arise?
EVGA - warranty goes with you. Plus looking just at 1080Thais looks like an easy £100+ saved. So yeah, seems worthwhile. Plus where I would buy it from would likely have UK support too. BE that Rainforest or the OldSmegg site.
I would happily buy from OCUK, but if im going over there anyway at the time I'm looking to buy. makes sense.
 
It absolutely works like that. I think you've
been caught up in the hype of expensive to buy = expensive to manufacture.

They've done it before when they had to with the GTX 200 series cards.

Nope, they have already taking amounts off. They will still have a ceiling point where they can't go below the threshold because of profit margins.

Nothing to do with expensive to buy = expensive to manufacture. It is that relative amount AMD or Nvidia actually get back relative is not anywhere near the thought most have since there are 3 other people taking cuts after them from the headline price and none are making a huge amount on their own, just these 20% make up at each stage adds up quick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom