Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Going to be rough time for Intel over the next 5 years.
Not sure why you think it only makes a difference for FP. Cache is used in almost all CPU workloads or at least any that need to retrieve and store data.The extra Cache will only make a difference in Floating Point workloads, which is not everything but its quite a lot of things.
Is it tho? for example Integer crunching?Not sure why you think it only makes a difference for FP. Cache is used in almost all CPU workloads or at least any that need to retrieve and store data.
Not sure why you think it only makes a difference for FP. Cache is used in almost all CPU workloads or at least any that need to retrieve and store data.
Remember when 192MB was a good amount of System RAM?
I remember when memory was measured in kilobytes
I'm not quite that old
Maybe I just started early
Yes. Like i said Cache is used in almost all CPU workloads or at least any that need to retrieve and store data.Is it tho? for example Integer crunching?
Yes. Like i said Cache is used in almost all CPU workloads or at least any that need to retrieve and store data.
It's essentially little more than DRAM except it's way, way faster, and more local.
Oh... Amiga 500+, early 1990's, that had 1MB of system RAM, which i upgraded to 2MB.
LOL! Such a youngster, to not experience the days when you could massively expand your ZX81 from 1KB to a massive 16KB ram pack! We've come a long, long way in the last forty years of home computing.
Did you watch the 5 years of Ryzen video? There is something quite revealing in it, they admit post Athlon days they have been indecisive and timid in execution, sitting around the table saying this wont work, that wont work, lets not do this its too risky it might not work, lets just play it safe.
Ryzen was the result of a focused short and long term roadmap, all the play it safe naysayers, the shirkers (the anchors holding them down) left the company, what you're left with is a tight group with a singular mind to shoot for the moon and work damned hard to get there. They have found their Athlon days mojo.
Edit: sorry the Dr Ian Cutress Video with the Zen chief architect.
Ryzen was also basically a last resort, the 2 plans on the table were for a ground up cpu (ryzen) or a heavy reworking of bulldozer to get more performance out of it. The bulldozer plan was the cheapest and at the time AMD were in the crap for money, so it took a big set of plums to go for the far more expensive option knowing it would take several years for it to see the light of day.
So if I was to build a PC for 70%Mining, 20%Gaming, 10% YouTube and Media.
Would I be going with 5900x or Alderlake?