• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 2 (Refresh) 3900XT/3800XT/3600XT

By upgrading I mean anyone going from anything (Intel or AMD) to an XT makes no sense. Better to either buy a 3600/3700x when the prices drop due to the refresh, or if you can simply wait for Zen3.
Agreed. If you buy new you would buy zen 3. If you are replacing zen or zen+ and on a budget then zen2 is clear winner. Otherwise zen 3 again
 
1usmus 2 hours ago on Twitter

"Ryzen XT series very close :)"

Maybe not July as originally thought. They might release the same time as B550. That would be interesting.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10b8CS7wQcM

Some number and qualifications there, seems less impactful than MCE tweaks on Intel.

Well yeah thats not hard given that MCE can more than double power consumption. :) Because enabling MCE can also bump voltages, and remove's power limits on the cpu.

Having watched it now, I see the point been made, that the actual power usage is only increased by a modest amount, the bigger concern is misreported numbers rather than a significant increased higher power consumption.

It would have been nice if GN tested 1.0 release bios's though. As the 3.00 bios may have been fixed after pressure from AMD.
 
Last edited:
Agreed. If you buy new you would buy zen 3. If you are replacing zen or zen+ and on a budget then zen2 is clear winner. Otherwise zen 3 again
I think these chips will be a nice upgrade for people with 300 series boards that are missing out on zen 3 but like you say are still rocking zen1/zen+.
 
I can't wait for the annoucement on 16th June... hoping for juicy price drops on the 3600/3700x! :)
I'll bet you a virtual beer they'll do an Nvidia Super and put the XT prices above the X prices. That will nicely set the bar to raise the baseline prices for Zen 3's release.

But it would be good to see the X get a chunky price drop.
 
I think these chips will be a nice upgrade for people with 300 series boards that are missing out on zen 3 but like you say are still rocking zen1/zen+.
Maybe, but zen2 still is better value in terms of bang for buck. If you are on 300 board it would make more sense to get a 450board and Zen3 maybe? Some of the 450 boards are very good value.

These refresh reminds me of the intel’s 4790k. Offers nothing in terms of refinement in architecture or even bringing high memory bandwidth support which you expect from a “tick-tock” cycle for using intel’s term. I really just hope this is a one off not a trend that AMD looking to repeat in the future.
 
These refresh reminds me of the intel’s 4790k.
To be fair, Devil's Canyon did try a few design changes that ultimately weren't successful so were dropped for the short-lived Broadwell. They were a more mature silicon too. Obviously silicon lottery plays a part, but I put 3 4770s and 2 4790s through a cheapo Asrock board for a client build and none of the Haswells would clock past 4.6GHz. Both the Devil's Canyon CPUs hit 4.8, and one of them even booted Windows at the mythic 5GHz.
 
I'll bet you a virtual beer they'll do an Nvidia Super and put the XT prices above the X prices. That will nicely set the bar to raise the baseline prices for Zen 3's release.

But it would be good to see the X get a chunky price drop.
The prices of XT when they are introduced indeed run higher, but the previous iterations will still go lower to shift them. I have zero intention to buy an XT anyway as it's just a marketing tactic to troll Intel and there is no real intention behind it of providing anything so worthwhile to consumers over the existing CPU's.

The smart buy until a Zen3 upgrade is imo undoubtedly the 3600 (non-x) which can easily be overclocked and is powerful enough for pretty much any creative task and can still power high-end GPU's at higher resolutions and details with no significant bottleneck. If the 3700x price drops enough I would also consider that, but it would have to drop more than it is likely to. In mid-2021 I will grab myself a 4700x or 4900x (or whatever I feel is the best option at the time) and then I will be set for a good while until AM5 matures. :)
 
i think announce next week for supply come July, i can live with that, hope they allow reviews prior to the release, really want to know what these are like, seriously considering one
else i'll buy low, and then upgrade to 4000 series next year
 
I think they'll be providing the silicon with the least amount of requirement, and no need to do anything but tighten memory timings.
Also they'll likely kick in at the price of the previous silicon, dropping it in amount, when both things occur, then I'll be in a better position to make a decision between going high at this stage, or going low and waiting for 4000.
 
Look at overclocked benchmarks of 3600/3800/3900's? They will just have increased core/boost clock speeds... what else do you think they are providing? :confused:
Improved memory controllers and faster Infinity Fabric; 2GHz IF was mentioned in the same leaks. That's going to give more of a performance uplift the just bumping the clocks, but a bump in clocks combined with a reduction in inter-CCX and cross-chiplet latency should net some tangible gains actually worth badging these as a new line of CPUs.

There is that screenshot floating around of the Ashes benchmark showing 3800XT having a chunky uplift over the 3800X.
 
Hmm, it all sounds like minor and inconsequential tweaks to me that would result in a max 10% performance uplift, but lets see when the reviews arrive I'll be happy if I'm wrong!
 
Back
Top Bottom