Fine have it your way. I say it’s the Ryzen 5 your saying it isn’t, we’ll see who is wrong when the time comes.she said it was an 8 core 16 thread part... SHE SAID THIS!!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c52ff/c52ff17eea75f5fa374792d68c3cb4c06c406d96" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Fine have it your way. I say it’s the Ryzen 5 your saying it isn’t, we’ll see who is wrong when the time comes.she said it was an 8 core 16 thread part... SHE SAID THIS!!!
Whilst we'd all like that to be true, the realist in me says, "No chance."I'll enjoy kicking them £500 i9s to the kerb with my £180 Ryzen 2, the new gaming king. Don't even need a new mobo lol.
Markings for second chiplet are visible...
![]()
How aren't you banned for trolling yet?
+1 I’m just waiting for gavin to pop in lol
Early silicon matching Intel's i9 space heater, my Lord what will it being doing in June..
The 9900k was missing 0.3ghz lmao.Emmm. It beat the Intel chip. So how is it "nearly"?
I'm with you on this. People getting hyped for performance we already have.
When its faster we will have something to talk about. Until then AMD are still playing catch up.
Your first sentence hits the nail on the head; the 9900K was definitely running at 4.7GHz for a 2040 score.Before the dunderheads take over: consider a 9900K @ 5.14GHz scores around 2250 in CB15. Now, consider an early Zen 2 8C ES is at 2050. ES tend to clock ~1GHz lower than final chips on desktop CPUs.
AMD has already won.
I'm with you on this. People getting hyped for performance we already have.
When its faster we will have something to talk about. Until then AMD are still playing catch up.
Fine have it your way. I say it’s the Ryzen 5 your saying it isn’t, we’ll see who is wrong when the time comes.![]()
Awww now that’s wishful thinking lolthe good thing about these chips is it will make the faster better gaming chips from intel cheaper ! which is still a win win for us all.
Whilst we'd all like that to be true, the realist in me says, "No chance."
You're new at this Internet thing aren't you?....AND cue six months of arguing! Hell i have a 2700x and am very happy, im sure the intel guys are very happy, does it really matter who's best as long as everyone is happy?![]()
One thing we should all remember - AMD aren't going to give anything away for free.I think the best thing we can do is just wait a little longer for people like Easyrider and dg and let them find out for themselves when the Ryzen 7/9 chips actually get released (and destroy the 9900k)
Running stock isn't missing anything lol.The 9900k was missing 0.3ghz lmao.
Early silicon matching Intel's i9 space heater, my Lord what will it being doing in June..
Celebrating the 50-year milestone AMD is to hit on May 1 this year
+1 I’m just waiting for gavin to pop in lol
I'm with you on this. People getting hyped for performance we already have.
When its faster we will have something to talk about. Until then AMD are still playing catch up.