AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***

[Chrisc]

I can already see it.

9900K 178 FPS
3800X 176 FPS

SEE. INTEL BETTER GAMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

100% this will happen

 

[TrixP10]

That moment when reviews show AMD faster than Intel for gaming, glorious.

And all the tech benching sites (tom's / anadtech) swap out their i9xxx's for AMD.

I'll drink to that.

 

[FoxEye]

Ugh... the smell of an AMD circlejerk is getting strong in here.

 

[N19h7m4r3]

Don't worry, regardless of how well these chips perform we can all be assured that DG will manage to find some benchmark in which Intel is still faster.
It may well be BF1 at 240p with CSGO updating in the background with 4x RTX titans.
But whatever it is. He will find it and claim Intel superiority.

Like one of the ARMA games, those things are like 50% faster on the oldest Intel chip vs Ryzen.

 

[N19h7m4r3]

And all the tech benching sites (tom's / anadtech) swap out their i9xxx's for AMD.

I'll drink to that.

Tom's the same Tom's that said "just buy it. can you imagine living a life without ray tracing?" in regards to the RTX launch? Hmmm

 

[RavenXXX2]

Anyone comment on how the 3600 is doing here.

https://twitter.com/TUM_APISAK/status/1134081984743976961

1

 

[Martini1991]

Right... 13% vs 15% i don't think it matters much.

While I agree.
It's stupid for AMD to publish both.

 

[Ross Thomson]

price per price is intel faster than amd?

 

[Yaayuh!]

Anyone comment on how the 3600 is doing here.

https://twitter.com/TUM_APISAK/status/1134081984743976961

1

Compared with the 2600X: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-6-Core-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600X/m810675vs3956

 

[4K8KW10]

Compared with the 2600X: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-6-Core-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600X/m810675vs3956

Just wow

Slightly faster single-core speed +5%
Slightly faster quad-core speed +13%
Slightly faster multi-core speed +14%
Peak Overclocked Bench +8%
Slightly faster OC single-core speed +6%
Slightly faster OC quad-core speed +10%
Slightly faster OC multi-core speed +8%

 

[GAC]

Compared with the 2600X: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-6-Core-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600X/m810675vs3956

interesting, so 11% faster on stock/non over clocked speeds. will be very interesting to see what happens when someone overclocks it to match that 4.3ghz base/boost

 

[Yaayuh!]

Just realised the error i made, compared with 2600x and not 2600.

3600 vs 2600 on this userbench thingy: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-6-Core-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600/m810675vs3955

Slightly faster single-core speed +11%
Faster quad-core speed +20%
Faster multi-core speed +21%
Peak Overclocked Bench +10%
Slightly faster OC single-core speed +11%
Slightly faster OC quad-core speed +11%
Slightly faster OC multi-core speed +9%

 

[GAC]

Just realised the error i made, compared with 2600x and not 2600.

3600 vs 2600 on this userbench thingy: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-6-Core-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600/m810675vs3955

haha missed that myself so 17% give or take and thats at stock so potential for a bit more with overclocking, so could break the fabled 20% mark maybe nice bump from one generation to the next though.

 

[Scougar]

Just wow

You need to pull yourself out of the negative place you have put yourself in, because you let yourself be pulled in by your own expectations. AMD are doing great.

 

[Potatowithearsontheside]

Another thing to consider here is that its with a X470 board. We don't know if there's any special sauce that will allow Zen 2 to perform better still with X570 boards.
That we're not seeing any X CPUs showing up in benches is another interesting thing. Keeping XFR improvement under wraps, perhaps?

 

[GAC]

Another thing to consider here is that its with a X470 board. We don't know if there's any special sauce that will allow Zen 2 to perform better still with X570 boards.
That we're not seeing any X CPUs showing up in benches is another interesting thing. Keeping XFR improvement under wraps, perhaps?

did see a few ryzen + on x370 v x470 boards and most of them seemed to be within margin of error when running at same speeds, now as for overclocking cant remember honestly if there was much if any difference either, as iv said above the only issues i could potentially see would be with the 12 and 16 cores due to potential power draw.

 

[4K8KW10]

You need to pull yourself out of the negative place you have put yourself in, because you let yourself be pulled in by your own expectations. AMD are doing great.

They are doing not bad. But the pricing doesn't correspond to the performance. Many people still sit on Core i 2nd or 3rd generation because until the present day they haven't found the reasons to upgrade.
Must tell you something.

 

[beany_bot]

Just wow

Slightly faster single-core speed +5%
Slightly faster quad-core speed +13%
Slightly faster multi-core speed +14%
Peak Overclocked Bench +8%
Slightly faster OC single-core speed +6%
Slightly faster OC quad-core speed +10%
Slightly faster OC multi-core speed +8%

The 3600 is running at 4ghz LOL. We all know thats not going to be the case. AND the 2600 is overclocked to 4.3.

this is a nonsense test. Relax.

 

[LePhuronn]

You need to pull yourself out of the negative place you have put yourself in, because you let yourself be pulled in by your own expectations. AMD are doing great.

Ah, so that's how you say "stop being a petulant child" without getting banned. Thanks, I've learned something today.

 

[GAC]

also something i just noticed it wasnt running full boost

Best Bench: 107% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)

the cpu is a 3.6ghz base 4.2ghz boost, so id imagine this was done on beta bios testing it so more to come for sure no doubt, role on E3 and the 10th of june for a better view of how it performs.