• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***

Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,648
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
Still doesn't do well in FC5 but FC5 always has been an outlier, i'm not worried about that and the 3600 has beaten the 2700X by some 22%.

For the rest, this is the entry level, none X 6 core very close to the much higher clocked 8 core 9900K. the Cinebech R20 single thread says it all, 478 vs 497, that's 4% to the 9900K but its clocked at 5Ghz ST vs the 4.2Ghz of the 3600, that is an IPC advantage of 15% to Zen 2.

Impressive stuff.
 
Permabanned
Joined
15 May 2006
Posts
4,107
Location
London
Oh come on learn how to add all images in one post.

Still nothing from known third parties, nearly there.
they leaked Ryzen 1 and refresh
Still doesn't do well in FC5 but FC5 always has been an outlier, i'm not worried about that and the 3600 has beaten the 2700X by some 22%.

For the rest, this is the entry level, none X 6 core very close to the much higher clocked 8 core 9900K. the Cinebech R20 single thread says it all, 478 vs 497, that's 4% to the 9900K but its clocked at 5Ghz ST vs the 4.2Ghz of the 3600, that is an IPC advantage of 15% to Zen 2.

Impressive stuff.
Do you think 3950x will beat 9900k in most games?
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,648
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
4.2Ghz 6 core vs 5Ghz 8 core, there's more to come... ^^^^^^^

I do, i think the 3700X will match the 9900K in almost all games. its got the 8 cores to match the 9900K and that 5% higher clocks vs the 3600 to take it there. oh i think the 3700X will be trading close blows with the 9900K in most games.

I'm going to put the 3700X at 140 FPS here...
3800X at 145 FPS

h4yDKny.jpg.png
 
Associate
Joined
24 Mar 2018
Posts
1,449
Location
Brighton
https://elchapuzasinformatico.com/2019/06/amd-ryzen-5-3600-x470-review/


It is true that we have been able to configure everything without problems and that the operation seems correct, although later we will see that the problems of the first generation of Ryzen processors with the memories seem to reproduce in latencies and copies.


Read more https://elchapuzasinformatico.com/2019/06/amd-ryzen-5-3600-x470-review/

Are they saying that memory problems still exist > I thought 3733 etc was fine ?
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,648
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
Although the question is meant for @humbug, my answer is no i don't think the 3950x will beat the 9900k in most games. I think it will actually annihilate the 9900k in every single game and almost certainly every single meaningful benchmark.

No... beyond 8C 16T i don't think there is any scaling, at that its all down to clock speed, Zen 2 has the IPC and i think the 3950X will have the clock speed to beat the 9900K, but not by much.

i think the 3700X will be a close match, the 3800X a definite match.
 
Permabanned
Joined
15 May 2006
Posts
4,107
Location
London
Rough translation from the beginning

As is usual with the AMD news, we anticipate its official launch to bring you a juicy review of the new AMD Ryzen 5 3600. It is true that we had to do it on a previous generation X470 motherboard, although with its BIOS updated for offer "total" compatibility (depending on the manufacturer) and drivers to the latest. Of course, do not worry, that shortly we will also have the review with an X570 board.

This review we could have published a few weeks ago, but we prefer to wait to have a final BIOS for the motherboard X470 and the X570, but for now the overclock does not work on the chosen motherboard, freezing the system just touch the multiplier.
 
Back
Top Bottom