• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***

You said it yourself they didnt catch it SC, hence its not been caught, and SC performance is still king for gaming. Even on MC, an 8086k is a beast, I think people get carried away thinking just because a 16c chip is put on the market it immediately mans anything less needs replacing, that pure hardware addiction kicking in.

An 8086k clocked at 5.2 is going to least 4 years easily.

PS5 will probably be 8/16 chips clocked at around 2.4-3.4ghz with 1C or 2C not been used for games. Even then any PS5 games ported to PC will likely have a different threading model, e.g. FF13LR was multi threaded on PS3 and single threaded on PC.

So 40+ghz of cpu power on PC vs 18-21ghz on console.
 
LOL

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13669931

All core 5.2Ghz

sc - 6714, mc - 64953

ame AMD 100-000000033-01
Topology 1 Processor, 16 Cores, 32 Threads
Identifier AuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 113 Stepping 0
Base Frequency 3.30 GHz
Maximum Frequency 5.20 GHz
Package
Codename Matisse
L1 Instruction Cache 32.0 KB x 16
L1 Data Cache 32.0 KB x 16
L2 Cache 512 KB x 16
L3 Cache 16.0 MB x 4
Single-Core Performance
 
chrcoluk said:
You said it yourself they didnt catch it SC, hence its not been caught, and SC performance is still king for gaming. Even on MC, an 8086k is a beast, I think people get carried away thinking just because a 16c chip is put on the market it immediately mans anything less needs replacing, that pure hardware addiction kicking in.

An 8086k clocked at 5.2 is going to least 4 years easily.

PS5 will probably be 8/16 chips clocked at around 2.4-3.4ghz with 1C or 2C not been used for games. Even then any PS5 games ported to PC will likely have a different threading model, e.g. FF13LR was multi threaded on PS3 and single threaded on PC.

So 40+ghz of cpu power on PC vs 18-21ghz on console.
Click to expand...

And the 8086 costed about £400 though for a 6 core... For someone who already has it, Ryzen isnt going to look worthwhile unless they need the 8, 12 or 16 core variants.
 
awaybreaktoday said:
LOL

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13669931

sc - 6714, mc - 64953

ame AMD 100-000000033-01
Topology 1 Processor, 16 Cores, 32 Threads
Identifier AuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 113 Stepping 0
Base Frequency 3.30 GHz
Maximum Frequency 5.20 GHz
Package
Codename Matisse
L1 Instruction Cache 32.0 KB x 16
L1 Data Cache 32.0 KB x 16
L2 Cache 512 KB x 16
L3 Cache 16.0 MB x 4
Single-Core Performance
Click to expand...

O.o vs 6212 for a 9900K @ 5ghz? :eek:
This is my eventual chip (decided on 3800X for the moment). That's... pretty mental if true.
It... also sets the max clock headroom..? That's rather a lot.

Synthetics/etc. Yes. Before the usuals start up :)

Least by the look of it, in about a week, there's going to be a few folks compelled to shut the F up.
 
awaybreaktoday said:
LOL

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13669931

All core 5.2Ghz

sc - 6714, mc - 64953

ame AMD 100-000000033-01
Topology 1 Processor, 16 Cores, 32 Threads
Identifier AuthenticAMD Family 23 Model 113 Stepping 0
Base Frequency 3.30 GHz
Maximum Frequency 5.20 GHz
Package
Codename Matisse
L1 Instruction Cache 32.0 KB x 16
L1 Data Cache 32.0 KB x 16
L2 Cache 512 KB x 16
L3 Cache 16.0 MB x 4
Single-Core Performance
Click to expand...

test FF13 lightning returns please. :)

Is cheap on steam.
 
Dimi said:
Ballistic LT memory kits any good then? I've got a MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC on the way and looking at their compatibility list it's not listed. Will this be an issue with the new CPU's, I'm probably going to look at getting a 3600 or the 3700X.
Click to expand...

Runs fine on mine mate, A-XMP profile 2 at 3200mhz, Not attempted to O/C it yet :)
 
Mercutio said:
O.o vs 6212 for a 9900K @ 5ghz? :eek:
This is my eventual chip (decided on 3800X for the moment). That's... pretty mental if true.
It... also sets the max clock headroom..? That's rather a lot.

Synthetics/etc. Yes. Before the usuals start up :)

Least by the look of it, in about a week, there's going to be a few folks compelled to shut the F up.
Click to expand...

The 5.2/5.3ghz 9900k I could find on geekbench scored around 7000 SC points

I think it's only fair to put them together at the same clockspeed, even though the 9900k clocks are on water while the 3950x is on LN2
 
StriderX said:
The latency is still looking a bit weird, though it could be the board, bios, memory used, settings...
Click to expand...

Weird how, do you mean high?
Grim5 said:
Terrible latency - 78ns
Click to expand...
I wouldn't exactly say terrible, higher latency is the price you pay for going with a chiplet design but i wouldn't call an extra 20ns odd terrible, especially as the advantage/disadvantage of chiplets become more apparent with higher/lower core counts respectively.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom