Did you ask Dianne Abbott what 8x3 wasRemember chaps, if you have an 8 core notebook you need a 32 core desktop!
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Did you ask Dianne Abbott what 8x3 wasRemember chaps, if you have an 8 core notebook you need a 32 core desktop!
Remember chaps, if you have an 8 core notebook you need a 32 core desktop!
That was the joke, put 2 and 2 together to get 5. It made sense in my headDid you ask Dianne Abbott what 8x3 was
I got it. What I don’t get is 4K8K’s law, it makes no sense whatsoeverThat was the joke, put 2 and 2 together to get 5. It made sense in my head
Hi stupid question time **
will ryzen 4000 series have more than 16 cores? if so whats the rumour mill saying? what's the likely ipc increase - Won't be upgrading for a year or two but curious.
Hi stupid question time **
will ryzen 4000 series have more than 16 cores? if so whats the rumour mill saying? what's the likely ipc increase - Won't be upgrading for a year or two but curious.
Very unlikely imo. It's going to be the same as Ryzen 1000 to 2000 in that it'll offer same core counts but higher ipc and small bump in clocks. The rumour is 10% higher ipc which is pretty large for a release on a refined node.
Hi stupid question time **
will ryzen 4000 series have more than 16 cores? if so whats the rumour mill saying? what's the likely ipc increase - Won't be upgrading for a year or two but curious.
I dont think so, 16c will likely be the maximum again but with increased IPC and increased clock speed
It really depends on the way the implement the removal of the dual CCX design and if that saves any space other than the increased density on offer with the 7nm+. They might end up with 10c chiplets, would be weird but still possible.
IPC should increase due to the design change, and obviously memory latency reduction will effect this as well
I don't think that the core count will remain the same. Very likely that the top part will still be 16-core/32-thread (it actually really doesn't need at this time to go any higher)
but Ryzen 5 must be 8-core, Ryzen 7 must be 12-core and so on.
Very unlikely imo. It's going to be the same as Ryzen 1000 to 2000 in that it'll offer same core counts but higher ipc and small bump in clocks. The rumour is 10% higher ipc which is pretty large for a release on a refined node.
What about all the talk from an AMD employee that it was a "new architecture" and that we should expect "all the performance gains" that come with a new arch?Very unlikely imo. It's going to be the same as Ryzen 1000 to 2000 in that it'll offer same core counts but higher ipc and small bump in clocks. The rumour is 10% higher ipc which is pretty large for a release on a refined node.
Thanks hopefully an 18 core if not a 16 core with 10% clock increase in two years
I dont think they'll even be targeting higher cores for mainstream at the moment as its quite a pointless endeavour as even the current 3950x and 3900x are overkill fr 99% of tasks.
AMD will benefit a lot more by focusing their energy on increasing clock speeds and IPC (which comes pretty naturally anyway).
E.g. could you imagine 12c and 16c parts hitting 5ghz clock speeds with 10-15% increase in IPC as well? Simply monstrous
I dont think they'll even be targeting higher cores for mainstream at the moment as its quite a pointless endeavour as even the current 3950x and 3900x are overkill fr 99% of tasks.
AMD will benefit a lot more by focusing their energy on increasing clock speeds and IPC (which comes pretty naturally anyway).
E.g. could you imagine 12c and 16c parts hitting 5ghz clock speeds with 10-15% increase in IPC as well? Simply monstrous
Hi stupid question time **
will ryzen 4000 series have more than 16 cores? if so whats the rumour mill saying? what's the likely ipc increase - Won't be upgrading for a year or two but curious.
The problem with focusing on clock speeds is that even if you manage to get great clocks on a given node, you can't stay on it forever (no matter what Intel thinks) and there's never a guarantee that the next node will be anywhere near as good. For this reason, plus power/heat advantages, IPC is far more important.I dont think they'll even be targeting higher cores for mainstream at the moment as its quite a pointless endeavour as even the current 3950x and 3900x are overkill fr 99% of tasks.
AMD will benefit a lot more by focusing their energy on increasing clock speeds and IPC (which comes pretty naturally anyway).
E.g. could you imagine 12c and 16c parts hitting 5ghz clock speeds with 10-15% increase in IPC as well? Simply monstrous
Yeah seen this already, looks impressive. Sounds better than Gimpworks already, using CPU sounds much better. It's like a hugely upgraded Havok.Well this would certainly be something that AMD processors would do well given the core counts
https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/a...ng-gaming-physics-courtesy-of-multi-core-cpus