• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** AMD "Zen 4" thread (inc AM5/APU discussion) ***

I've built my 7700X + ASRock B650 PG Lightning system, boots fine into Windows 11 all files and programs on this SSD still there :)

I updated the drivers with ASRock's auto driver tool, then downloaded the latest Win updates. Disabled fTPM then updated to latest BIOS firmware.

I've tested running my 2x16GB RAM at DDR 6000 MT/s, CAS Latency 28 1.4v for memory voltages and memtest x86+ passed several times.

I would advise not lowering CL below 28, will likely make your system unbootable without clearing the CMOS. DDR5 set to 6600 MT/s also has the same effect.

I would guess that for CAS latency, motherboards need to support specific ICs (e.g. Samsung, Hynix, Micron) to be able to set CL and other memory timings lower. No DDR5 modules are sold with CL lower than 28 atm...

Running DDR5 @ 6400 MT/s maybe depends on the tier/ quality of the CPU's silicon, not sure?

I'm going to try PBO tuning for the CPU next, as expected it runs hot.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know if there is a 1T or 2T command rate setting for DDR5 memory, on Zen 4?

EDIT - So, according to Aida64, the command rate is set to 1t, which is generally the optimal setting.
 
Last edited:
AMD has responded to the claims of poor gaming performance for the 7950x in windows 11 and that disabling ccx's improved performance.

Their response: We are investigating the reports but have so far been unable to replicate them
 
Last edited:
So, I tuned up my 7700X with a PBO curve editor tuning of -30 (All Core Curve Optimizer Magnitude), it's working nicely now, getting between 5.35-.5.4ghz on all cores for a 7700X with a Deepcool AK620 air cooler + MX4 thermal paste (tested under full load with CPUz).

I've set the PBO platform thermal limit to 90 C, down from the default of 95 C (this has a slight effect on the frequencies you get).

EDIT - The interesting thing is, I set the thermal limit to 70 C just to test it, and it was still getting 5.2Ghz on all cores in the CPUz benchmark (I tested this because my dad is building a similar system as well, and wanted to know if it will run well even when limited to lower temps).

The results without PBO curve editor configured weren't impressive under load (was struggling to get 5.0ghz on all cores).
 
Last edited:
If you have asus mobo,there is option in bios to activate PBO Enhancement in BIOS level1/level2/level3 90/80/70c and with 2 cliks i have selected level 3 70c and in gaming i have constant 5400ghz clock on 7600x sometimes goes to 5300ghz but its almost all the time 5400ghz,with average temperature 62-64 sometimes touch 71c but mostly in mid 60s,i think for most users who are are just gaming this is the best option,that curve optimizer and minus and plus then testing for me is hassle and takes a lot of time,this pbo ench. optios is great,litteraly 3 clicks

 
Last edited:
If you have asus mobo,there is option in bios to activate PBO Enhancement in BIOS level1/level2/level3 90/80/70c and with 2 cliks i have selected level 3 70c and in gaming i have constant 5400ghz clock on 7600x sometimes goes to 5300ghz but its almost all the time 5400ghz,with average temperature 62-64 sometimes touch 71c but mostly in mid 60s,i think for most users who are are just gaming this is the best option,that curve optimizer and minus and plus then testing for me is hassle and takes a lot of time,this pbo ench. optios is great,litteraly 3 clicks


That's what I like! Nice and simple. I simply cannot be bothered tinkering with stuff like how I used to.

Side note, never understood why they let oyu download thigns like "chipset drivers" etc, doesn't Windows just do that for you?
 
Last edited:
Upgrading from a broken 5950x.
Am I sane
My basket at OcUK:

Total: £1,809.43 (includes delivery: £10.50)​

Hoping thats a quick switcheroo and be back up and running again.​
 
Last edited:
Upgrading from a broken 5950x.
Am I sane
My basket at OcUK:

Total: £1,809.43 (includes delivery: £10.50)​

Hoping thats a quick switcheroo and be back up and running again.​

Judging by RAM I am guessing you do something that actually needs that much? If just for gaming then no you aren't :D
 
Upgrading from a broken 5950x.
Am I sane
My basket at OcUK:

Total: £1,809.43 (includes delivery: £10.50)​

Hoping thats a quick switcheroo and be back up and running again.​
Would personally not buy a 7950X at that price, considering the 3D cache version will be so much more powerful.

I'd consider a cheap AM4 CPU to tide you over until 3d cache release, Crosshair hero probably cheaper by 7000 3d cache launch too.
 
Would personally not buy a 7950X at that price, considering the 3D cache version will be so much more powerful.

I'd consider a cheap AM4 CPU to tide you over until 3d cache release, Crosshair hero probably cheaper by 7000 3d cache launch too.
Depends a lot on his use case. Not everything is cache sensitive.
 
Is it a bad idea to force the clock rate of a Zen 4 CPU at 5500 Mhz via 'Manual CPU overclocking'?

I seem to be getting more consistent and higher CPU clock frequencies this way, with the voltage just set to 'Auto' on the manual overclocking BIOS screen.

Haven't tested stability with Prime95 yet though.

EDIT - So, the problem with running at a fixed voltage, is things like Prime95 can use a huge amount of power, and apparently any PBO thermal limits you've set will just be ignored (so temps can reach unsafe levels > 100 Celsius).
 
Last edited:
Gaming mostly. Some photoshop
DCS and Microsoft flight sim

Flight Simulator was one of the games which showed massive gains using the Ryzen 7 5800X3D over the other Zen3 CPUs. I would definitely wait for the Zen4 X3D parts,or buy a Ryzen 7 5800X3D as I have seen a few offers for it for under £400.

Also spending £650 on a motherboard is not worth it when a motherboard under £300 would be fine.
 
Last edited:
Flight Simulator was one of the games which showed massive gains using the Ryzen 7 5800X3D over the other Zen3 CPUs. I would definitely wait for the Zen4 X3D parts,or buy a Ryzen 7 5800X3D as I have seen a few offers for it for under £400.

Also spending £650 on a motherboard is not worth it when a motherboard under £300 would be fine.

From what I've seen the X3D only makes a real difference fps wise at lower resolutions, correct me if i'm wrong. The below graph is in VR so more like 4k res.

cUL5qCN.jpg
 
Last edited:
From what I've seen the X3D only makes a real difference at lower resolutions, correct me if i'm wrong.

cUL5qCN.jpg
You can see it at normal resolutions:

Also if you look at some reviews,the 1% lows and frametime consistency is much better on the Ryzen 7 5800X3D against the Ryzen 7 5800X. In VR the difference is very noticeable:

In some games the differences are even more:

That is a fixed drawcall test in Fallout 4.

BTW,if someone has a Zen4 CPU,if some of you can run that Fallout 4 test I would appreciate it!
 
Last edited:
You can see it at normal resolutions:

Also if you look at some reviews,the 1% lows and frametime consistency is much better on the Ryzen 7 5800X3D against the Ryzen 7 5800X. In some games the difference are even more:

That is a fixed drawcall test in Fallout 4.

BTW,if someone has a Zen4 CPU,if some of you can run that Fallout 4 test I would appreciate it!
So at 1080p and 1440p the X3D excels but doesn't make much difference at 4K or above, apart from the 1% lows.
 
Back
Top Bottom