you think that they should design a chip for a crippled OS?So AMD spent all their R&D money on developing towards the next steam deck Chip better Linux support and power usage.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
you think that they should design a chip for a crippled OS?So AMD spent all their R&D money on developing towards the next steam deck Chip better Linux support and power usage.
buy a 7950x3d and save money.The only decision I have to make is whether to go for the whole shebang and get the 9950X or take advantage of the lower TDP of the 9900X, either way it will be a massive upgrade from my 3930K so I can't lose.
Failure on launch!Looks like more of the same from AMDs new Ryzen rocket lake.
Unfortunately X3D is faster at gaming but slower for media creation which will the primary use for this boxbuy a 7950x3d and save money.
amd need to drop the price fast or they will score many own goals. I hope X3D chips perform better.
Yes, I want better GEM support for my early 90s music studio.you think that they should design a chip for a crippled OS?
Im not sure it is a failure, Im leaning towards @Doop! idea that this could just be dodgy scheduling as the stated gains are there in Linux.Failure on launch!
Boring launch. Slower in gaming than previous gen, high idle power consumption still not fixed.
X3D parts will be absolutely amazing though, even if they still have high idle power consumption.
Linux is surprisingly good.Let's all move to Linux then
I called it a few pages back that I thought the 9900X and 9950X would follow the same path as the 9600/9700X so unless the X3D parts have some new tech the 7xxxX3D doesn't then its going to be the same.Boring launch. Slower in gaming than previous gen, high idle power consumption still not fixed.
X3D parts will be absolutely amazing though, even if they still have high idle power consumption.
there's always team blue (for now)I called it a few pages back that I thought the 9900X and 9950X would follow the same path as the 9600/9700X so unless the X3D parts have some new tech the 7xxxX3D doesn't then its going to be the same.
So everyone whats next,power limits,overclocking,power efficiency,disabling HT,wait for the 9900X/9950X,AMD marketing is fine...
Linux is surprisingly good.
In total I ran nearly 400 benchmarks. When taking the geometric mean of all the raw performance results, the Ryzen 9 9950X came out to being 19.6% faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X. The Ryzen 9 9900X meanwhile was 21.5% faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X across this wide mix of workloads. The Ryzen 9 9950X was 33% faster than the Intel Core i9 14900K performance overall and even the Ryzen 9 9900X was 18% faster than the Core i9 14900K
Simply put, I am extremely impressed with the Ryzen 9 9900 series. If you are a creator, developer, or just doing any heavy lifting on your desktop across a range of workloads, the Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X proved to be terrific options. These new AMD Ryzen 9900 series processors deliver great generational uplift and better power efficiency than the prior Ryzen 9 7900 series parts and the Intel Core 14th Gen competition. At $499 USD for the Ryzen 9 9900X and $649 USD for the Ryzen 9 9950X these processors are also priced fair.
you tell meWhy don't more use it then ? For mainstream desktop?
The only decision I have to make is whether to go for the whole shebang and get the 9950X or take advantage of the lower TDP of the 9900X, either way it will be a massive upgrade from my 3930K so I can't lose.
Failure on launch!