• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 5 rumours

No cut down cores/e-cores for Ryzen 8000 series desktop CPUs confirmed:


They say that the scheduling between larger and smaller cores can be tricky...

Max core count will be 16, still on track for 2024 release.

Might see e-core like cores used in lower power devices, maybe laptops? Seems appropriate.

You do know the AMD Zen and Zen C core is nothing like Intel’s Skylake Atom mashup?

Zen and Zen C are the same core it’s just an innovation to add more cores with less silicon.
 
You do know the AMD Zen and Zen C core is nothing like Intel’s Skylake Atom mashup?

Zen and Zen C are the same core it’s just an innovation to add more cores with less silicon.
Never mentioned Zen 4C cores, they are essentially just shrunk down Zen 4 cores from what I've read.

I was just commenting that AMD is not going to follow Intel, and integrate E-cores (or similar) into their desktop CPUs.

Some people were speculating that they would use E-cores for Zen 5, I'm glad they decided against the idea.
 
Last edited:
Never mentioned Zen 4C cores, they are essentially just shrunk down Zen 4 cores from what I've read.

I was just commenting that AMD is not going to follow Intel, and integrate E-cores (or similar) into their desktop CPUs.

Some people were speculating that they would use E-cores for Zen 5, I'm glad they decided against the idea.

Well they can't anyway apparently, because the guy from amd said the platform doesn't have enough bandwidth to support more than 16 cores anyway, so not having E cores isn't even choice, but at a fact of the system limitations. This is further made clear when one of the guy's main reasons for "choosing" not to have E cores is because Windows sucks at the thread scheduling and he specifically mentions Intel does fine but AMD doesn't want to make its own thread director and all of this after the guy acknowledged that E cores make sense and save power on laptops but again they won't happen because AMD doesn't want to create a software solution to fix threading issues and the platform cant support more cores anyway.
 
Last edited:
£220.

A 16 core 7950X is as fast in MT as a 24 core 13900K.
You think it will launch at 220? Usually it's 300 for the 6core part, no?

An i5 is twice as fast as an R5, and with the way things are going on, even the i5 from 2021 will be faster than the 8600x in mt. That is nasty isn't it?
 
Last edited:
You think it will launch at 220? Usually it's 300 for the 6core part, no?

An i5 is twice as fast as an R5, and with the way things are going on, even the i5 from 2021 will be faster than the 8600x in mt. That is nasty isn't it?

You have to go as low as the 13400 to get an i5 the same price as the R5 7600, its £10 more

The 13400 scores 1794 in R23
The 7600 scores 1868, +4%, not a huge difference, but the 7600 is also a good chunk faster than that in gaming.
 
Last edited:
Well they can't anyway apparently, because the guy from amd said the platform doesn't have enough bandwidth to support more than 16 cores anyway, so not having E cores isn't even choice, but at a fact of the system limitations. This is further made clear when one of the guy's main reasons for "choosing" not to have E cores is because Windows sucks at the thread scheduling and he specifically mentions Intel does fine but AMD doesn't want to make its own thread director and all of this after the guy acknowledged that E cores make sense and save power on laptops but again they won't happen because AMD doesn't want to create a software solution to fix threading issues and the platform cant support more cores anyway.

Zen scales down to 10watts. Big little maybe something to consider for an entry into the mobile phone market.
 
You have to go as low as the 13400 to get an i5 the same price as the R5 7600, its £10 more

The 13400 scores 1794 in R23
The 7600 scores 1868, +4%, not a huge difference, but the 7600 is also a good chunk faster than that in gaming.
I think those are the ST speeds, not the MT. Anyways, I hope amd really fixes the mt performance in the 300-500 range, cause it lags a couple of generations behind
 
AMD could possibly start at 4 cores with Zen 5. though with the current lead, AMD could easily use Zen 3 (maybe even Zen 2) for some products and remain competitive. AMD could possibly expand across different nodes. It could be advantageous to go those routes.
 
I think those are the ST speeds, not the MT. Anyways, I hope amd really fixes the mt performance in the 300-500 range, cause it lags a couple of generations behind

They are so far behind at the low end/entry level MT that there is no way to catch-up without adding more cores. The 8600x would need to be 8 cores, 8700x 10 cores
 
Last edited:
Bencher by name Bencher by nature. How did you manage to get yourself suspended so quickly after your previous suspension just finished?!?

Early rumours on this chip look promising in terms of IPC, hopefully AMD won't kneecap it by throttling the power budget.

Yeah, give hardcore guys something play with. Maybe a solder pad we can bridge under the IHS to get a few more watts. Or pair of traces we can grind away on the PCB. Warranty voided, but fun to be had.
 
So extremely early leaks say a possible regression in clock speeds for arrow lake and a win for Zen 5. It was said a while ago on here that AMD would win out over all for a few years to come, looks liek that may be contiuning.
 
Back
Top Bottom