Caporegime
Lol, not sure what your understanding of engineering samples are, but there are quite a few out there. All of which pretty much mirror the retail silicon for overclocking range in this instance. Just trying to put a plug on the misinformation that gets posted here.
The chap behind CanardPC(who leaked these scores) leaked the first Athlon 64 scores months before everybody else. They were clocked at 1.4GHZ and the interwebs had people saying AMD will fail because of low clockspeeds.
The Athlon 64 launched at 2.0GHZ and 2.2GHZ and the latter was the insanely priced FX51. OFC,we also had the first Phenom too,which did the opposite.
Hence,we can't really say AMD WON'T hit higher clockspeeds yet. ES are not really indicative of what final clockspeeds will be of Ryzen going by the history of AMD CPUs.
Plus AMD has is apparently using a new type of Turbo too - which looks very much like what Nvidia does for its GPUs,so you have a minimum range of base clock step-ups,but the max boost is more dependent on cooling,power,etc and none of these chips seem to have it working either.
The noise on forums is that these were motherboard validation CPUs which were tested.
Last edited: