• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** AMD "Zen" thread (inc AM4/APU discussion) ***

2666 oc and dual channel.....

(ry)Zen going to be seriously deficient memory wise compared to intel's consumer and enthusiast lines if this is the case....

Almost every person I know who has a Skylake system runs the memory at the official settings Intel has defined which is 2133MHZ or 2400MHZ IIRC and if higher clockspeeds were that important Intel would have validated them as standard.

Realistically 99% of people who buy CPUs probably don't overclock RAM and it will only be a few enthusiasts moaning about it.

Edit!!

Plus the Ryzen CPUs have a decent amount of L3 cache too,and we might be seeing 4C/8T CPUs with loads of it.
 
Last edited:
2666Mhz oc and dual channel might be ok for now but its a little too close to the point where performance starts to seriously suffer across a wide range of apps and games. Anyone running a 6700k l, especially if overclocked, with 2133Mhz ram is most definitely holding back their system. (or course its well know that running mem much above 3000Mhz shows very little gain outside of benchmarks)
 
2666Mhz oc and dual channel might be ok for now but its a little too close to the point where performance starts to seriously suffer across a wide range of apps and games. Anyone running a 6700k l, especially if overclocked, with 2133Mhz ram is most definitely holding back their system. (or course its well know that running mem much above 3000Mhz shows very little gain outside of benchmarks)

you know I linked a review disproving what you have just asserted.....
 
Lol!!!! check the conclusion's of your own link or be prepared to look foolish. You posted the link do you agree with it or not?

do you genuinely have an inability to read? I shall quote for you

After spending dozens of hours benchmarking ten different memory speeds on the Intel Z170 + Skylake platform we must admit that we are too shocked by the findings. Our benchmarks show that the memory bandwidth increased, but there wasn’t a tangible improvement in system performance with real applications. We ran other applications and game titles when we tested this memory kit and you mostly ended up with flat performance charts like you saw in Handbrake or any of the game titles that we tested today.
 
Lol!!!! check the conclusion's of your own link or be prepared to look foolish. You posted the link do you agree with it or not?
I dunno what bit you're looking at, but outside of the memory bandwith benchmarks RAM speed made next to no difference to overall performance in the benchmarks in the article so I can't see how they come up with that conclusion.
 
Lol!!!! check the conclusion's of your own link or be prepared to look foolish. You posted the link do you agree with it or not?

Seriously? Your going to argue over a gain of like 4fps or something where it's gone from 117fps to 121fps? Yes at those FPS I'm going to notice that difference /boggle.

Some of you lot just love to find stuff to argue or naysay about even if it's tantamount to grasping at straws.

Seriously grow up already
 
That will be the review that states

'We saw some nice performance gains from DDR4-2133 to DDR4-2666'

http://www.legitreviews.com/ddr4-me...nding-the-best-ddr4-memory-kit-speed_170340/6

Check your own sources or look foolish....

No where in the summing up (the link you posted) does it say that, what it actually says is:

"but there wasn’t a tangible improvement in system performance with real applications. We ran other applications and game titles when we tested this memory kit and you mostly ended up with flat performance charts like you saw in Handbrake or any of the game titles that we tested today"
 
No where in the summing up (the link you posted) does it say that, what it actually says is:

"but there wasn’t a tangible improvement in system performance with real applications. We ran other applications and game titles when we tested this memory kit and you mostly ended up with flat performance charts like you saw in Handbrake or any of the game titles that we tested today"

It sums up saying......

'Our advice for gamers and enthusiasts would be to get at least a DDR4-2666 kit as that is the sweet spot this very second'

Do you agree with their findings or not?

You are holding an oc 6700k back with 2133Mhz memory and of

do you genuinely have an inability to read? I shall quote for you

Again a quote from an article YOU posted, do you agree with the findings and conclusions or not?
 
Last edited:


It sums up saying......

'Our advice for gamers and enthusiasts would be to get at least a DDR4-2666 kit as that is the sweet spot this very second'

Do you agree with their findings or not?

You are holding an oc 6700k back with 2133Mhz memory and of

Don't understand the relevance when it says Zen can do DDR4-2666MHZ.

I have no problem believing that Zen's got a crap IMC though in comparison to Kaby etc.
 
It sums up saying......

'Our advice for gamers and enthusiasts would be to get at least a DDR4-2666 kit as that is the sweet spot this very second'

Do you agree with their findings or not?

You are holding an oc 6700k back with 2133Mhz memory and of

Their real world gains are very little, marginal improvements, as they said in summing up, having said that they are improvements none the less, so even if it is just 2 FPS yes 2666Mhz is desirable over 2133Mhz.

And thats fine, given that Zen runs 2666Mhz DDR4.
 
Back
Top Bottom