Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
eddiew;30483462 said:(Which makes me wonder if all i5s are failed i7s...)
EXxx;30483090 said:i don't think people with OC'ed 4770K i7's and upwards will switch that easily.
At this point unless the 8c/16t ryzen OC's to around 4.5-4.8 with respectable voltage,the only people upgrading will be the ones that need cores more than speed.
I still don't understand Twitter's thread layout.CAT-THE-FIFTH;30483363 said:
SiDeards73;30483563 said:I know a few people on these boards with 4770k have already said if the performance is even just comparable they will upgrade for more cores.
Add to that the twitch people on 4770k and older have to upgrade to something just because etc...
Anyhow if those prices are anywhere within £30 of being accurate and the performance is there, AMD will shift a ton of chips
SiDeards73;30483563 said:I know a few people on these boards with 4770k have already said if the performance is even just comparable they will upgrade for more cores.
Add to that the twitch people on 4770k and older have to upgrade to something just because etc...
Anyhow if those prices are anywhere within £30 of being accurate and the performance is there, AMD will shift a ton of chips
~>Dg<~;30483684 said:actual bit of news. now bring on the benchmarks.
DragonQ;30483593 said:I still don't understand Twitter's thread layout.
Hotwired;30483819 said:What are some of you guys wanting a core monster for.
Mostly into gaming here, highly suspect nothing good will happen past the 4 core ones for that.