Agreed. So far it looks like the lowest tier of every core count variant from AMD is going to be half the price of Intel's unlocked equivalent. The leaked benchmarks suggest the performance is definitely there, which leaves Intel with only one trump card: clock speed. If Ryzen struggles to get above 4.5 GHz whilst Kaby Lake can reach 4.9-5.0 GHz, then Intel will still have something to hold onto until Coffee Lake: best single threaded performance. If Ryzen clocks well and recent benchmarks are accurate, Intel will have no choice IMO but to make drastic changes to their line-up before Coffee Lake or risk haemorrhaging sales. On the other hand they may decide that OEMs are too sweet on Intel for retail sales to make any kind of difference in the short term.When across the board AMD's chip are half the price of Intel's they are going to have to do a hell of a lot better than reducing prices by 10% to lure now AMD buyers back to Intel.
Doesn't count as unlocked in my book.Technically speaking they were all unlocked too, the multipliers may have been fixed but the FSB wasn't so they could be overclocked by 1.5GHz+
The only reason the base clock on later chipsets wasn't overclockable was because it drove too many devices. Wasn't the base clock overclockable on Skylake CPUs because of chipset changes before it was artificially locked down for Kaby Lake?
EDIT: Um, why are the letters "a-r-i-a" censored in the word "v-a-r-i-a-n-t"??
Last edited: