Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 11,098
Oh basic question, If I use 2 sticks of ram, say 2x 16gb, that will be duel channel memory ? Or am I going to need 4 sticks ?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Oh basic question, If I use 2 sticks of ram, say 2x 16gb, that will be duel channel memory ? Or am I going to need 4 sticks ?
EEE DUAL aka TWO so why would you need four for two ?? Where is the logic LOLOh basic question, If I use 2 sticks of ram, say 2x 16gb, that will be duel channel memory ? Or am I going to need 4 sticks ?
EEE DUAL aka TWO so why would you need four for two ?? Where is the logic LOL
we should teach them a lesson and get gibbo to start posting a load of crazy wrong facts so they post it
3K+ dimms working fine on Asus Cross hero.
2666(OC) for DRAM. That's likely as good as it gets.
Plus, I'm never wrong
AMD thrashing Intel on price/performance but the general public opting for Intel anyway due to brand power, I'm kinda optimistic that AMD will be able to make more of a go of it this timeI'm expecting it to be like the Athlon XP days.
You must be mistaken, it's clarly impossible:
I'm trying to avoid spending money, but I'm just doing some basic video editing on my i7 quad haswell at 3.37Ghz (laptop), and mother of bob its cray slow, ugggghhhh might have to pre-order
I was just checking dude, the logic COULD BE Ryzen runs channel one as slots 1+3 and channel 2 2+4 - I don't know do I, hence why I was asking - that means 2 sticks would be channel 1 only, Or more likely slot 1 is channel 1, slot 3 is channel 2, and slot 2 and 4 follow respectively
You must be mistaken, it's clarly impossible:
AMD thrashing Intel on price/performance but the general public opting for Intel anyway due to brand power, I'm kinda optimistic that AMD will be able to make more of a go of it this time
Well they released Cinebench/blender/etc benchmarks that have been independently validated by trusted sources so I felt fine to pre-order, maybe the gaming performance will be no better than Intel but for workstation/VM/etc use it looks like a great upgrade.anyone pre ordering before benchmarks out is kinda puzzling.
maybe if they are faster than intel.remember amd have been showing us snippets of what they are faster at in very limited cicumstances.overall they could still be quite a bit slower. anyone pre ordering before benchmarks out is kinda puzzling.
You must be mistaken, it's clarly impossible:
I'm saying nothing
I think our various members here have that covered.
Very mature of you. If you're going to ignore what i've posted since then, you might as well just stop talking. Especially since I doubt you'll be able to show any 3000Mhz results for yourself. "Clarly" you don't really care either way.
Probably for the best for the same reasons.
anyone pre ordering before benchmarks out is kinda puzzling.
Will have to wait until Ryzen 5 or Ryzen 3 is released, as that's more my price range I'm afraid. Although if you want to send your free sample out when you get it, I'll give it a go.