Caporegime
If you have a 6000 or 7000 GPU it will also work on all DX11 and DX12 games whether the game has it or not, they software will do it.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Well, there's two related, but different technologies here - FSR3 frame gen has to be implemented on a game-by-game basis but benefits from tighter integration with the engine and will result in better image quality. The driver-level frame gen will work much like the driver-level FSR works at the moment - it only has 2D info to work with so the generated frames will be inferior.fluid motion tech i.e frame gen in almost any dx 11 and 12 games through the drivers which is a big thing cos amd says nvidia frame gen has to be a game by game basis stuff. So thats a big thing and if open source some upscaler app like that magic thing on steam i think might be able to let nviida users use it too one day.
https://youtu.be/MgdWjcl318U?t=1647 at 27:27 mark
That's huge news.fluid motion tech i.e frame gen in almost any dx 11 and 12 games through the drivers which is a big thing cos amd says nvidia frame gen has to be a game by game basis stuff. So thats a big thing and if open source some upscaler app like that magic thing on steam i think might be able to let nviida users use it too one day.
https://youtu.be/MgdWjcl318U?t=1647 at 27:27 mark
Wow and if it works on older AMD, Nvidia and Intel Arc GPUs then that would be amazing. I wonder how Nvidia will respond.Top banana news, will have a look at the Digital Foundry coverage
Sounding pretty, pretty good. Maybe I'll be hanging on to my 3090 for ages....
"In terms of fluidity and clarity, FSR 3 looked a match for DLSS 3 - a view shared by Alex, Rich and John, who were all present to see the demos in person. A great start for FSR 3."
AMD reveals long-awaited FSR 3 tech and frame gen for every DX11/DX12 game
DF goes 'eyes on' with FSR 3 - and a new AMD frame-gen solution that works with every DX11 and DX12 game.www.eurogamer.net
I dont think it is, i think hyper x, whatever its called on the stream, i think its from 5700xt and up not rdna 3 only like digital foundry have said as i think its a mistake on their article.That's huge news.
Edit: the driver level one is only RDNA 3 though.
I'm not sure they need to? Unless FSR3 frame-gen is demonstrably as good (image quality and latency) as DLSS3?I wonder how Nvidia will respond.
For AMD to be the only one of 3 companies without a hardware-upscale solution is just plain embarrassing now, made worse by the fact that their latest hardware is CAPABLE of it!!! Shoddy at best :rage:(they haven't had to respond to FSR2 because DLSS2 is widely regarded as superior).
Top banana news, will have a look at the Digital Foundry coverage
Sounding pretty, pretty good. Maybe I'll be hanging on to my 3090 for ages....
"In terms of fluidity and clarity, FSR 3 looked a match for DLSS 3 - a view shared by Alex, Rich and John, who were all present to see the demos in person. A great start for FSR 3."
AMD reveals long-awaited FSR 3 tech and frame gen for every DX11/DX12 game
DF goes 'eyes on' with FSR 3 - and a new AMD frame-gen solution that works with every DX11 and DX12 game.www.eurogamer.net
You’re assuming the AMD options will be as good as the Nvidia ones, but that typically isn’t the case.It's a good they announced this early, if gives time for the hardcore Nvidia fans to find their next excuse to justify their cards lol.
My prediction:You’re assuming the AMD options will be as good as the Nvidia ones, but that typically isn’t the case.
It’s all warm and fuzzy that it works for everyone, but that means that there will have been compromises.
For AMD to be the only one of 3 companies without a hardware-upscale solution is just plain embarrassing now, made worse by the fact that their latest hardware is CAPABLE of it!!! Shoddy at best :rage:
FSR3 is suspected to still be based on FSR2 but with the additional frame generation features. It's not good enough imo.I get its annoying having the tech there and not being used but if FSR 3 turns out to be as good as DLSS which the DF guys seem to think it is then ultimately does it really matter? I'd say it's more embarrassing for Nvidia who said frame gen couldn't be done on cards below the 4000 series
I get its annoying having the tech there and not being used but if FSR 3 turns out to be as good as DLSS which the DF guys seem to think it is then ultimately does it really matter? I'd say it's more embarrassing for Nvidia who said frame gen couldn't be done on cards below the 4000 series
Firstly Antilag+ is only for rdna3 users. Antilag is for rdna2 users. Non AMD cards will get sth but presumably worse?
So you will have very different experiences based on where you turn it on.
It doesn't look to work independently off sr. You need fsr to be on to allow frame gen. Fsr2 works separately.
Rx 6000 and rtx 30 and above are recommended.
It is supported on 5000 and rtx 20 but in the blog post they say not to use it there.
So for the best experience you are gonna need rdna3 cards with antilag+
Antilag doesnt reduce latency significantly. So rdna2 and below has some question marks.
I'm hoping at the very least that they have a continuous update feature like the newer DLSS implementation does so games aren't 'stuck' on a lower one forever. No hardware solution though.....very disappointed.Lets wait and see how FSR 3 looks outside of the sponsored titles first before starting with the "dlss killer" hype again..... FSR 2 is still not a patch on dlss outside of a couple of hand picked games i.e. remember the claims of zero ghosting with deathloop? Only to end up with ghosting in most games where FSR is used (and more than dlss, which got lambasted for it's initial ghosting issues)
As @JediFragger mentioned, AMD hasn't confirmed that upscaling has changed from FSR 2.2 (apart from the new FSR 'native AA' mode) - all DF were commenting on was the new frame generation tech (in a very controlled, hands-off demo).I get its annoying having the tech there and not being used but if FSR 3 turns out to be as good as DLSS which the DF guys seem to think it is then ultimately does it really matter? I'd say it's more embarrassing for Nvidia who said frame gen couldn't be done on cards below the 4000 series
Yup, there's still a small chance they'll branch off with RDNA3 with hardware which is what I'm hoping for tbh.As @JediFragger mentioned, AMD hasn't confirmed that upscaling has changed from FSR 2.2 (apart from the new FSR 'native AA' mode) - all DF were commenting on was the new frame generation tech (in a very controlled, hands-off demo).