Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yes it does annoy me.
raytracing performance is dire.
Still 10% better than a 4070 @ 1440p
Turn on dlss3 then the 4070 is 93% better....
How many games support DLSS3 though.
www.igorslab.de
6 so deffo need more than 1 hands worth,
Isn't it on par with a 3090? looks like it on the benchmarks I have seen
videocardz.com
7800xt is 8% faster than 6800xt
So if you can find a 6900xt at a good price buy that instead
Simulated Radeon RX 7800 XT GPU ends up 4% to 13% faster than RX 6800 XT - VideoCardz.com
Modded Radeon PRO W7800 has been tested in gaming Igor’sLAB has a performance simulation of a Radeon W7800 workstation card turned gaming. Just yesterday a first purported AMD Navi 32 GPU pictures have emerged. This unreleased GPU could be AMD’s response to the growing popularity of upper...
So this is 32 CU 128Bit:
Difference in CU.
RX 7700: 48 (+50%)
RX 7700XT: 54 (+69%)
RX 7800: 60 (+88%)
Taking scaling in to account i'm thinking....
As an RTX 2070S owner the RX 7700XT is of interest to me, its a bit more expensive than the 6700XT MSRP was, but with 70% more shaders and a 192Bit vs 128Bit Bus its got to be at least 60% faster than the RX 7600, putting it between the RX 6800 and RX 6800XT, closer to the latter.
£500, about £40 more than the 6700XT MSRP and about £50 less than the RX 6800 MSRP, i'm ok with that. its quite a bit more, for less, its a better deal than anything Nvidia have.
Its ok.
