I don't think it has.
Any religious people watch the Wonders of Life last night?
- Thread starter Johnnytoxic
- Start date
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
Do you think there were humans without eyes and then there were humans who evolved eyes, is that where you are approaching this from, otherwise the question is absurd.
Been here a billion times, already provided tonnes of evidence, studies, papers - go and dig it up because I don't want to go through it all again.
I'm not going to provide any more evidence or answers for you, because you've been told and told and told and you just ignore all of it every single time. I have personally provided heaps of evidence directly to you in the several threads that were in SC and you ignored absolutely all of it, so no more.
There's so much information waiting for you, if you spend 1/10th the time you did in here talking BS, actually learning about the subject then we'd all be far better off.
Go and read proper literature by real people - not liars and youtube,
Evidence has been posted ad nauseum.
Go read it objectively. Ignore your religious standpoint for now, then you may understand
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 113
Has been answered many times before. I'm afraid for the sake of speed and convieniance I've gone for evolution of mollusc eyes as it had a reputable source (encyclopedia britannica) and a simple to understand clear diagram.
http://media-3.web.britannica.com/eb-media/43/79543-004-C3F00EE8.jpg
You have not provided any evidence to show scientifically how the eye evolved bit by bit, no one can do this, this is a fact.
This just shows stages of complexity not bit by bit stages of evolution.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
No i believe God created the first human with the eye with all its complex components all at once for it to function or work.
The Eye is an organ, its evolution is thought to have happened relatively rapidly during the Cambrian Explosion and evolution doesn't mean something evolved like building a house, with half finished examples...there were more primitive, yet complete visual organs that gradually evolved into more complex and specialised organs over time, in the case of the Eye it is though it went from simpe photosensitive cells to complex vision as quickly as half a million years.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
I know you do, but what is the evidence to support that belief?
We have evidence, where is yours?
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
Even the pope believes,
I have read lots of these assumptions, it is impossible to observe eye evolution, no one knows how the eye could have been designed or evolved. The evolution of the eye is an assumption, a theory and not proven fact, well, not proven by the real scientific method anyway.
I don't understand the point you are trying to make. Are you saying because you can't have every stage placed in front of you on a table for you to see it can't have happened like that at all? Or just interested to know if there are any examples of any of the steps in the fossil record?
The steps are obviously far harder to see if in soft tissues than say the changes in the skeletal developement of mamals.
Yes, it is a Scientific Theory. Scientific Theory = Fact, for the layman.
It's impossible to observe God........God is an assumption and not proven fact. So what makes your assumptions (which have far less substantiated supporting evidence) than that of pretty much everyone else with the obvious exceptions?
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 113
In regards to common ancestory the wikipedia link on transitional fossils has many good examples on top of this we can look a common features in present day speacies in very different genus to both indicate common ancestory and speacialisation.
http://advocacy.britannica.com/blog/advocacy/wp-content/uploads/wing.gif
Notice in all examples, the forearm part of the limb has two bones rather than a single. Notice the complex arrangement of wrist bones between the simpler digits and the radius/ulna. Notice how 4 very different animals in very different environments (human, bat, turtle and dolphin) have 5 digits but that these digits have adapted in proportion to fill out new roles.
Aha you may say but the bird and horse have a different number of digits. I'm glad you noticed, I can't speak for the bird but here have some examples of transitional fossils going from a creature with a more familiar pentadactyl form to a horses hoof.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/aqa_pre_2011/evolution/evolutionrev3.shtml
Nature in short, is awesome.
http://advocacy.britannica.com/blog/advocacy/wp-content/uploads/wing.gif
Notice in all examples, the forearm part of the limb has two bones rather than a single. Notice the complex arrangement of wrist bones between the simpler digits and the radius/ulna. Notice how 4 very different animals in very different environments (human, bat, turtle and dolphin) have 5 digits but that these digits have adapted in proportion to fill out new roles.
Aha you may say but the bird and horse have a different number of digits. I'm glad you noticed, I can't speak for the bird but here have some examples of transitional fossils going from a creature with a more familiar pentadactyl form to a horses hoof.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/aqa_pre_2011/evolution/evolutionrev3.shtml
Nature in short, is awesome.