Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Christ, this is painful.
You were talking about LHR cards. Like I've said, you're relying on Google for info whereas the people you are engaging with actually own and use the hardware. The 3060ti I bought a few weeks ago is not Low Hash Rate.
There is no beta driver or hacks for other LHR cards. Buy a mining card if you want to mine. Dont sell a gaming gpu if you mined on it for full second hand value. They are not designed for the loads and overclock miners put on the cards. As stated by the manufacture and the fact it voids warrenty.
Now the strawman. Personal experience is the lowest form of evidence, its considered unreliable. Personal experience arguments are routinely used by crackpots and sharletons because they want to avoid something like evidence based reasoning.
Using google would be supperior in every way to your personal experience because it would be searching a bigger pool of knowledge and with good reasoning you could find evidence or observations that dont aline with your experience. Yet you argue like google search for evidence is somehow something wrong. Your strawman arguement is not intellegent, its the opposite. The issue here is you dont google.
My advise, be honest and tell the guy buying any of your near death husks. That these are mining cards, that they are worth a small fraction of msrp and likely have no warrenty. Likely to die after 6 months or lower.
At least from OCUK they will replace the pads, the paste, clean the card, test the card and give you a 90 day warrenty. Sell the card as b-grade.
Now the strawman. Personal experience is the lowest form of evidence, its considered unreliable. Personal experience arguments are routinely used by crackpots and sharletons because they want to avoid something like evidence based reasoning.
Using google would be supperior in every way to your personal experience because it would be searching a bigger pool of knowledge and with good reasoning you could find evidence or observations that dont aline with your experience. Yet you argue like google search for evidence is somehow something wrong. Your strawman arguement is not intellegent, its the opposite. The issue here is you dont google.
The internet (ie what Google uses) can be a cesspit of unregulated disinformation. Personal experience or obtaining information from sources you trust is more reliable. Google is but a tool for researching information - it still needs validation against other data inputs. Google is also well known to harbour its fair share of ‘crackpots and sharletons’. Did you know that 5G caused COVID BTW?
What a load of absolute rubbish.
Hi all is it still a bad time to upgrade a GPU at the moment and if so any chance of it ending soon?
Looking to upgrade my gtx770. ( I know pretty old ) looking to spend £250 ish any recommendations or is it best to wait.
Opinion is subjective argument, like experience. Personal experience is the argument of everyone from god is real, to the earth is flat. I have shown objective proof. Not me thats going to look like the worlds biggest moron. Just warming you. Attacking someone with proof and evidence already posted in thread. The type of evidence thats makes something an unassailable point. Leads only to place, getting your ass kicked.
Feel feel to knock your head against the wall. I dont have to reply. My point is proven and made.
Opinion is subjective argument, like experience. Personal experience is the argument of everyone from god is real, to the earth is flat. I have shown objective proof. Not me thats going to look like the worlds biggest moron. Just warming you. Attacking someone with proof and evidence already posted in thread. The type of evidence thats makes something an unassailable point. Leads only to place, getting your ass kicked.
Feel feel to knock your head against the wall. I dont have to reply. My point is proven and made.
Plays worlds smallest violin. Growup.
anything you can tweak in Afterburner is what the card is rated to handle.
It's also unlikely that the card is rated to handle the overclocks on a sustained basis - fine for gaming where you have (relatively) short bursts of intense usage, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's not going to have a negative effect if you run it at 120% 24/7. If that were the case, then why wouldn't they be factory clocked to run at those speeds? Nvidia etc. wouldn't purposefully make their cards worse for no reason
Opinion are based on evidence actually.
What you talk about is belief.
Many confuse those two.
They don't do it for no reason, they do it because they don't have the resource to test each and every individual card to work out it's limitations. The obvious solution is to settle on a uniform set of parameters that all the units can handle without issue.
Question: has there been a single RMA refused on the basis of misuse where there has been no hardware modification or BIOS modification? I can't recall ever seeing a case discussed in the near decade that I've been an active member here