So like the comment bellow a pretty pointless comment, that is unless I'm not seeing how the source effects the validity.
You just quoted me saying "I wasn't insinuating the graphic was wrong", then question how the source effects validity, which I never said it did. I'm not sure what is confusing here.
Is there some GD rule that every post has to have an ulterior meaning, or is there some form of gatekeeping as to what makes a comment 'pointless'? Either way, bored, enjoy.